Paper · 1967 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Continuous Submergence Versus Alternate Flooding and Drying on Growth, Yield, and Nitrogen uptake of Rice1

W. H. Patrick; W. A. Quirk; F. J. Peterson; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A comparison was made of rice ( Oryza saliva ) grown under continuously submerged conditions and under alternately dry and flooded conditions in several greenhouse and field experiments. With nitrogen‐deficient soils, alternately dry and submerged conditions caused an appreciable decrease in growth, yield, and nitrogen uptake. With soils high in available nitrogen as a result of being in permanent pasture for several years, drying and reflooding resulted in a yield increase. Drying and reflooding apparently resulted in a loss of soil nitrogen which was detrimental in the nitrogen‐deficient soils and beneficial in the soils that had been in pasture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate drying and submergence decreased rice growth on nitrogen-deficient soils.

Treatment
alternately dry and submerged conditionse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
Continuous Submergencet0
Setting
nitrogen‐deficient soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With nitrogen‐deficient soils, alternately dry and submerged conditions caused an appreciable decrease in growth, yield, and nitrogen uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Continuous Submergence Versus Alternate Flooding and Drying on Growth, Yield, and Nitrogen uptake of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate drying and submergence decreased rice yield on nitrogen-deficient soils.

Treatment
alternately dry and submerged conditionse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
Continuous Submergencet0
Setting
nitrogen‐deficient soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With nitrogen‐deficient soils, alternately dry and submerged conditions caused an appreciable decrease in growth, yield, and nitrogen uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Continuous Submergence Versus Alternate Flooding and Drying on Growth, Yield, and Nitrogen uptake of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate drying and submergence decreased rice nitrogen uptake on nitrogen-deficient soils.

Treatment
alternately dry and submerged conditionse0
Outcome
nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
Continuous Submergencet0
Setting
nitrogen‐deficient soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With nitrogen‐deficient soils, alternately dry and submerged conditions caused an appreciable decrease in growth, yield, and nitrogen uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Continuous Submergence Versus Alternate Flooding and Drying on Growth, Yield, and Nitrogen uptake of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying and reflooding increased rice yield in soils high in available nitrogen after permanent pasture.

Treatment
drying and refloodinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Continuous Submergencet0
Setting
soils high in available nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With soils high in available nitrogen as a result of being in permanent pasture for several years, drying and reflooding resulted in a yield increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–488 · show in text ↑
t0

“Continuous Submergence Versus Alternate Flooding and Drying on Growth, Yield, and Nitrogen uptake of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–115 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drying and reflooding apparently caused soil nitrogen loss, detrimental in nitrogen-deficient soils and beneficial in former pasture soils.

Treatment
Drying and refloodinge0
Outcome
loss of soil nitrogene0
Direction
losse0
Qualifier
apparentlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drying and reflooding apparently resulted in a loss of soil nitrogen which was detrimental in the nitrogen‐deficient soils and beneficial in the soils that had been in pasture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–115 · show in text ↑

flooding · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 42 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

flooding · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

138 papers: 64 positive, 74 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

134 papers more in this group

See all 138 papers →

flooding · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

286 papers: 193 positive, 93 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

282 papers more in this group

See all 286 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.