Paper · 2003 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Leaf Responses to Reduced Iron Availability in Two Tomato Genotypes: T3238FER (Iron Efficient) and T3238fer (Iron Inefficient)

Silvia Donnini; Antonella Castagna; Lucia Guidi; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
22
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The present work is aimed at evaluating some effects induced by different levels of iron availability in the growth medium for two different tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) genotypes, the T3238fer (Tfer), unable to activate mechanisms for iron mobilization and uptake known as “strategy I,” and its correspondent wild‐type T3238FER (TFER). By using different iron concentration in the growth solution, the most suitable iron level to induce phenotypic differences between the two genotypes without being lethal for the mutant was found to be 40 µM Fe‐Na‐EDTA. The analyses were carried out also on plants grown with 80 µM Fe‐Na‐EDTA, an iron concentration at which the two genotypes showed no phenotypic differences. A significant decrease in total leaf iron and chlorophyll content was detected in both genotypes following reduction of iron concentration in the nutrient solution, and was particularly evident in Tfer40, which showed symptoms of chlorosis. The photo‐electron transport rate of the whole chain was significantly affected by growth conditions as well as by genotype, the lowest activity being detected in Tfer40 plants. Chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis revealed an increase in non‐photochemical quenching (q NP) of Tfer plants grown at both iron concentrations, indicating the activation of photoprotective mechanisms, which, however, were not sufficient to prevent photoinhibition when plants were grown at 40 µM iron, as indicated by significant reduction in PSII photochemistry (F v/F m) and photochemical quenching (q P). The actual quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) and the intrinsic PSII efficiency (ΦEXC) showed the same behavior of q P and F v/F m ratio. A significant effect of mutation and iron supply on all the pigments was detected, and was particularly evident in the mutant grown at 40 µM iron. A different behavior was shown by the three pigments involved in the xantophyll cycle, violaxanthin being less affected than chlorophylls and the other carotenoids, and zeaxanthin even increasing, due to the xanthophyll cycle activation. In conclusion, the interaction between iron deprivation and fer mutation induced functional alterations to the photosynthetic apparatus. Anyway, as far as concerns the photo‐electron transport activity, the influence of fer mutation seemed to occur independently from iron supply.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forty µM Fe‐Na‐EDTA distinguished the tomato genotypes without killing the mutant.

Treatment
40 µM Fe‐Na‐EDTAe0
Outcome
phenotypic differences between the two genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the most suitable iron level to induce phenotypic differences between the two genotypes without being lethal for the mutant was found to be 40 µM Fe‐Na‐EDTA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–574 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 80 µM Fe‐Na‐EDTA, the genotypes showed no phenotypic difference.

Treatment
80 µM Fe‐Na‐EDTAe0
Outcome
phenotypic differencese0
Direction
noe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“80 µM Fe‐Na‐EDTA, an iron concentration at which the two genotypes showed no phenotypic differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–731 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing iron significantly decreased total leaf iron and chlorophyll content in both genotypes, especially Tfer40.

Material
Tfer40e0
Treatment
reduction of iron concentratione0
Outcome
total leaf iron and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease in total leaf iron and chlorophyll content was detected in both genotypes following reduction of iron concentration in the nutrient solution, and was particularly evident in Tfer40, which showed symptoms of chlorosis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tfer40 showed chlorosis.

Material
Tfer40e0
Outcome
symptoms of chlorosise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tfer40, which showed symptoms of chlorosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–972 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth conditions and genotype significantly affected whole-chain photoelectron transport, with the lowest activity in Tfer40.

Material
Tfer40e0
Outcome
photo‐electron transport rate of the whole chaine0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photo‐electron transport rate of the whole chain was significantly affected by growth conditions as well as by genotype, the lowest activity being detected in Tfer40 plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1151 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tfer plants at both iron levels had increased nonphotochemical quenching.

Material
Tfere0
Outcome
non‐photochemical quenching (q NP)e0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
both iron concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in non‐photochemical quenching (q NP) of Tfer plants grown at both iron concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1295 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40 µM iron, Tfer plants had reduced PSII photochemistry and photochemical quenching.

Treatment
40 µM irone0
Outcome
PSII photochemistry (F v/F m) and photochemical quenching (q P)e0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when plants were grown at 40 µM iron, as indicated by significant reduction in PSII photochemistry (F v/F m) and photochemical quenching (q P)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1559 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actual and intrinsic PSII efficiency followed the same pattern as photochemical quenching and Fv/Fm.

Outcome
actual quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) and the intrinsic PSII efficiency (ΦEXC)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The actual quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII) and the intrinsic PSII efficiency (ΦEXC) showed the same behavior of q P and F v/F m ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1561–1693 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mutation and iron supply significantly affected all pigments, particularly in the mutant at 40 µM iron.

Treatment
iron supplye0
Outcome
all the pigmentse0
Qualifier
mutant grown at 40 µM irone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant effect of mutation and iron supply on all the pigments was detected, and was particularly evident in the mutant grown at 40 µM iron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1840 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Violaxanthin was less affected than chlorophylls and other carotenoids.

Outcome
violaxanthine0
Direction
less affectede0
Comparator
chlorophylls and the other carotenoidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“violaxanthin being less affected than chlorophylls and the other carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2004 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zeaxanthin increased with xanthophyll cycle activation.

Outcome
zeaxanthine0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
xanthophyll cycle activatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zeaxanthin even increasing, due to the xanthophyll cycle activation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2010–2077 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron deprivation and fer mutation induced functional alterations in the photosynthetic apparatus.

Treatment
iron deprivatione0
Outcome
functional alterations to the photosynthetic apparatuse0
Qualifier
fer mutatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interaction between iron deprivation and fer mutation induced functional alterations to the photosynthetic apparatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2094–2214 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of fer mutation on photoelectron transport appeared independent of iron supply.

Outcome
photo‐electron transport activitye1
Qualifier
fer mutatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of fer mutation seemed to occur independently from iron supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2282–2358 · show in text ↑
e1

“photo‐electron transport activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2247–2280 · show in text ↑
e2

“tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–188 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Iron deficiency caused leaf chlorosis in tomato.

    IRON IS REQUIRED FOR THE INDUCTION OF ROOT FERRIC CHELATE REDUCTASE ACTIVITY IN IRON-DEFICIENT TOMATO · 2001

    Opposite directionCited by this paperAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.