Paper · 2003 · Journal of Vegetable Crop Production

Fertilizer Type, But Not Time of Cessation of Irrigation, Affect Onion Development and Yield in a Semi-Arid Region

L. Abbey; R. A. L. Kanton

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Onion production is limited by environmental factors, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. A two-year study was carried out to investigate the response of onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Bawku Red to the application of farmyard manure (FYM), inorganic fertilizer (IF) or a combination of manure and inorganic fertilizer (FYM+IF) when irrigation is withheld just before breakover or at 50% breakover. Onion plant height, foliage weight, bulb diameter and bulb weight were increased by FYM+IF in both years. Onion bulb yield due to the FYM+IF treatment was 34.1% higher than that for FYM, and 4.6% higher than that for the IF treatment. The highest number of split bulbs, which are not marketable but are used by producers under our economic conditions, was recorded for FYM+IF plots (mean for two years, 6800 bulbs/ha) with FYM recording the lowest (mean for two years, 1100 bulbs/ha). Application of FYM either alone or in combination with IF significantly (P < 0.05) reduced bulb rot. The percentage of marketable bulbs was not different among treatments. Neither time when irrigation was withheld nor the interaction of nutrient × time when irrigation was withheld affected onion growth and bulb yield. Thus, application of both FYM+IF at half their recommended rates increased onion bulb yield and reduced field defects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+IF increased onion plant height, foliage weight and bulb diameter in both years.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepae1
Material
Bawku Rede0
Treatment
FYM+IFe1
Outcome
plant height, foliage weight, bulb diametere1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Semi-Arid Regiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Affect Onion Development and Yield in a Semi-Arid Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Bawku Red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“Onion plant height, foliage weight, bulb diameter and bulb weight were increased by FYM+IF in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+IF increased onion bulb weight in both years.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepae1
Treatment
FYM+IFe1
Outcome
bulb weighte1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Onion plant height, foliage weight, bulb diameter and bulb weight were increased by FYM+IF in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+IF gave 34.1% higher onion bulb yield than FYM.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepae2
Treatment
FYM+IFe2
Outcome
bulb yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
34.1%e2
Comparator
FYMe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Onion bulb yield due to the FYM+IF treatment was 34.1% higher than that for FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+IF gave 4.6% higher onion bulb yield than the inorganic fertilizer treatment.

Taxon
OnionAllium cepae2
Treatment
FYM+IFe2
Outcome
bulb yielde2
Direction
highere3
Value
4.6%e3
Comparator
IF treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Onion bulb yield due to the FYM+IF treatment was 34.1% higher than that for FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–594 · show in text ↑
e3

“and 4.6% higher than that for the IF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+IF gave the highest number of split onion bulbs, 6800 bulbs/ha on average over two years.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
FYM+IF plotse4
Outcome
number of split bulbse4
Direction
higheste4
Value
6800 bulbs/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Bawku Red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–205 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest number of split bulbs, which are not marketable but are used by producers under our economic conditions, was recorded for FYM+IF plots (mean for two years, 6800 bulbs/ha) with FYM recording the lowest (mean for two years, 1100 bulbs/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM gave the lowest number of split onion bulbs, 1100 bulbs/ha on average over two years.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
FYMe4
Outcome
number of split bulbse4
Direction
loweste4
Value
1100 bulbs/hae4
Comparator
FYM+IF plotse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Bawku Red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–205 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest number of split bulbs, which are not marketable but are used by producers under our economic conditions, was recorded for FYM+IF plots (mean for two years, 6800 bulbs/ha) with FYM recording the lowest (mean for two years, 1100 bulbs/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of FYM alone or with IF significantly reduced onion bulb rot.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Application of FYM either alone or in combination with IFe5
Outcome
bulb rote5
Direction
reducede5
Value
P < 0.05e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Bawku Red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–205 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of FYM either alone or in combination with IF significantly (P < 0.05) reduced bulb rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–993 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percentage of marketable onion bulbs did not differ among treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Outcome
percentage of marketable bulbse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.) cv. Bawku Red”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 169–205 · show in text ↑
e6

“The percentage of marketable bulbs was not different among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Time when irrigation was withheld did not affect onion growth and bulb yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae7
Treatment
time when irrigation was withhelde7
Outcome
growth and bulb yielde7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“Neither time when irrigation was withheld nor the interaction of nutrient × time when irrigation was withheld affected onion growth and bulb yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM+IF at half the recommended rates reduced field defects in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
FYM+IF at half their recommended ratese0
Outcome
field defectse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of both FYM+IF at half their recommended rates increased onion bulb yield and reduced field defects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1331 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

irrigation · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 106 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.