Paper · 2006 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Leaf Chlorophyll Readings as an Indicator for Spinach Yield and Nutritional Quality with Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications

Yan-Ju Liu; Yi-Ping Tong; Yong-Guan Zhu; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
64
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to investigate the possibility of predicting the concentrations of total nitrogen (N), nitrate-nitrogen, and ascorbic acid in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) leaves using the pocket chlorophyll meter SPAD-502 (Minolta, Japan) in a pot experiment in a greenhouse. Spinach plants were grown in plastic pots filled with 0.5 kg of brown soil per pot with urea as N fertilizer at 0, 30, 60, 120, and 240 mg N/kg soil. SPAD readings of the two uppermost fully expanded leaves were recorded 18, 25, and 32 d after sowing and at harvesting (34 d). Dry-matter biomass and total N concentrations in leaves and roots, and NO3-N, and ascorbic acid concentrations in leaves, were measured after harvesting. SPAD readings showed continuous reduction with increasing growth period irrespective of N applications. SPAD readings at harvest were significantly correlated with total N, leaf dry weight (DW), and NO3-N concentration. However, this correlation did not exist between SPAD readings and ascorbic acid concentrations in leaves. The above results suggest that it is possible to apply SPAD readings to estimate NO3-N concentrations in spinach plants, and that they may be applied for field assessments in decision-making and operational nutrient-management programs for the plant. Furthermore, the SPAD method may also be useful for ascertaining the harvest time. The results suggest that treatment with 120 mg N/kg significantly improved both leaf yields and leaf quality (i.e., leaf nitrate-N concentration and ascorbic acid). Too little and too much N fertilizer was not good for yield or spinach quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD readings fell as spinach growth progressed regardless of N application.

Organ / stage
growth periode0
Outcome
SPAD readingse0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
irrespective of N applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPAD readings showed continuous reduction with increasing growth period irrespective of N applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, SPAD readings were significantly correlated with total leaf nitrogen.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
total Ne0
Qualifier
SPAD readings at harveste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPAD readings at harvest were significantly correlated with total N, leaf dry weight (DW), and NO3-N concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, SPAD readings were significantly correlated with leaf dry weight.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
leaf dry weight (DW)e0
Qualifier
SPAD readings at harveste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPAD readings at harvest were significantly correlated with total N, leaf dry weight (DW), and NO3-N concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, SPAD readings were significantly correlated with nitrate nitrogen concentration.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
NO3-N concentratione0
Qualifier
SPAD readings at harveste0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPAD readings at harvest were significantly correlated with total N, leaf dry weight (DW), and NO3-N concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SPAD readings did not correlate with spinach leaf ascorbic acid concentration.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
ascorbic acid concentrationse0
Qualifier
SPAD readingse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, this correlation did not exist between SPAD readings and ascorbic acid concentrations in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed SPAD readings to estimate spinach nitrate nitrogen.

Outcome
estimate NO3-N concentrationse0
Qualifier
field assessmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The above results suggest that it is possible to apply SPAD readings to estimate NO3-N concentrations in spinach plants, and that they may be applied for field assessments in decision-making and operational nutrient-management programs for the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1307 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed SPAD readings as a guide to harvest timing.

Outcome
ascertaining the harvest timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, the SPAD method may also be useful for ascertaining the harvest time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 120 mg N/kg significantly improved spinach leaf yield.

Treatment
120 mg N/kge0
Outcome
leaf yieldse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest that treatment with 120 mg N/kg significantly improved both leaf yields and leaf quality (i.e., leaf nitrate-N concentration and ascorbic acid).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 120 mg N/kg significantly improved spinach leaf nitrate nitrogen concentration and ascorbic acid quality.

Treatment
120 mg N/kge0
Outcome
leaf nitrate-N concentration and ascorbic acide0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest that treatment with 120 mg N/kg significantly improved both leaf yields and leaf quality (i.e., leaf nitrate-N concentration and ascorbic acid).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both insufficient and excessive nitrogen fertilizer were unfavorable for spinach yield and quality.

Outcome
yield or spinach qualitye0
Qualifier
Too little and too much N fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Too little and too much N fertilizer was not good for yield or spinach quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1635 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

43 papers: 38 positive, 5 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.