Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment with 120 mg N/kg significantly improved spinach leaf nitrate nitrogen concentration and ascorbic acid quality.

A claim from Leaf Chlorophyll Readings as an Indicator for Spinach Yield and Nutritional Quality with Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 120 mg N/kg significantly improved spinach leaf nitrate nitrogen concentration and ascorbic acid quality.

Treatment
120 mg N/kge0
Outcome
leaf nitrate-N concentration and ascorbic acide0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results suggest that treatment with 120 mg N/kg significantly improved both leaf yields and leaf quality (i.e., leaf nitrate-N concentration and ascorbic acid).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1555
t0

“Spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–53

Title

Leaf Chlorophyll Readings as an Indicator for Spinach Yield and Nutritional Quality with Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications

Yan-Ju Liu; Yi-Ping Tong; Yong-Guan Zhu; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2006. doi:10.1080/01904160600767401

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e9166a828a65733189e6f1fcf002683ff5526a064dba0730c3f1d91fbef76c4b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.