Abstract
The number of grains per spikelet and the number of spikelets per spike are important factors that influence grain yield in wheat. Three wheat genotypes in four foreign groups (OA, OC, OH and OJ) differing in spike type and Japanese cultivars (cvs) were grown under various combinations of seeding densities and fertilization levels. In all groups, the spikelet number per spike and the spike length at maturity were highest at low seeding densities and high levels of fertilization. The OA group (Nepal) and Haruyutaka (Japanese cv) gave a weak response in spikelet number per spike, while the OJ group (Xinjiang Uygur, China) gave a weak response in spike length. The OC group (except for T6), the OH group (Tibet) and Japanese cvs (except for Haruyutaka) responded to treatments in both spikelet number per spike and spike length. The T6 genotype in the OC group (Nepal) gave a weak response in both spikelet number per spike and spike length. Although the OA group had the longest spikes and the OJ group had the shortest spikes, there was no difference in the duration of spike elongation between the OA group and the OJ group. Spike length appeared to be determined mainly by the rate of spike elongation and was not restricted by the dry weight of the spike during the growth phase of the spike.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Spikelet number per spike and spike length at maturity were highest at low seeding densities and high fertilization levels in all wheat groups.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Organ / stage
- at maturitye0
- Treatment
- low seeding densities and high levels of fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- spikelet number per spike and the spike length at maturitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e0“In all groups, the spikelet number per spike and the spike length at maturity were highest at low seeding densities and high levels of fertilization”
Claim · model-written summary
The OA group (Nepal) gave a weak response in spikelet number per spike.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- OA group (Nepal)e1
- Outcome
- spikelet number per spikee1
- Direction
- weak responsee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e1“The OA group (Nepal) and Haruyutaka (Japanese cv) gave a weak response in spikelet number per spike”
Claim · model-written summary
Haruyutaka (Japanese cv) gave a weak response in spikelet number per spike.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Haruyutaka (Japanese cv)e1
- Outcome
- spikelet number per spikee1
- Direction
- weak responsee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e1“The OA group (Nepal) and Haruyutaka (Japanese cv) gave a weak response in spikelet number per spike”
Claim · model-written summary
The OJ group (Xinjiang Uygur, China) gave a weak response in spike length.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- OJ group (Xinjiang Uygur, China)e2
- Outcome
- spike lengthe2
- Direction
- weak responsee2
- Setting
- Xinjiang Uygur, Chinae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e2“the OJ group (Xinjiang Uygur, China) gave a weak response in spike length”
Claim · model-written summary
The OC group (except for T6) responded to treatments in spikelet number per spike and spike length.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- OC group (except for T6)e3
- Treatment
- treatmentse3
- Outcome
- spikelet number per spike and spike lengthe3
- Direction
- respondede3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e3“The OC group (except for T6), the OH group (Tibet) and Japanese cvs (except for Haruyutaka) responded to treatments in both spikelet number per spike and spike length”
Claim · model-written summary
The OH group (Tibet) responded to treatments in spikelet number per spike and spike length.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- OH group (Tibet)e3
- Treatment
- treatmentse3
- Outcome
- spikelet number per spike and spike lengthe3
- Direction
- respondede3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e3“The OC group (except for T6), the OH group (Tibet) and Japanese cvs (except for Haruyutaka) responded to treatments in both spikelet number per spike and spike length”
Claim · model-written summary
Japanese cultivars except Haruyutaka responded to treatments in spikelet number per spike and spike length.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- Japanese cvs (except for Haruyutaka)e3
- Treatment
- treatmentse3
- Outcome
- spikelet number per spike and spike lengthe3
- Direction
- respondede3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e3“The OC group (except for T6), the OH group (Tibet) and Japanese cvs (except for Haruyutaka) responded to treatments in both spikelet number per spike and spike length”
Claim · model-written summary
The T6 genotype gave a weak response in both spikelet number per spike and spike length.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- T6 genotypee4
- Outcome
- spikelet number per spike and spike lengthe4
- Direction
- weak responsee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e4“The T6 genotype in the OC group (Nepal) gave a weak response in both spikelet number per spike and spike length”
Claim · model-written summary
The OA group had the longest spikes among the groups.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- OA groupe5
- Outcome
- spikese5
- Direction
- longeste5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e5“Although the OA group had the longest spikes and the OJ group had the shortest spikes”
Claim · model-written summary
The OJ group had the shortest spikes among the groups.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- OJ groupe5
- Outcome
- spikese5
- Direction
- shorteste5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e5“Although the OA group had the longest spikes and the OJ group had the shortest spikes”
Claim · model-written summary
The duration of spike elongation did not differ between the OA and OJ groups.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- OA groupe5
- Outcome
- duration of spike elongatione5
- Direction
- no differencee5
- Comparator
- OJ groupe5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e5“there was no difference in the duration of spike elongation between the OA group and the OJ group”
Claim · model-written summary
Spike length appears to be determined mainly by the rate of spike elongation.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- spike lengthe6
- Qualifier
- rate of spike elongatione6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e6“Spike length appeared to be determined mainly by the rate of spike elongation and was not restricted by the dry weight of the spike during the growth phase of the spike”
Claim · model-written summary
Spike length was not restricted by the dry weight of the spike during the growth phase.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- spike lengthe6
- Qualifier
- not restricted by the dry weight of the spike during the growth phasee6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effect of the Interaction between Cultural Condition and Genotype on Spike Morphogenesis in Spring Wheat”
e6“Spike length appeared to be determined mainly by the rate of spike elongation and was not restricted by the dry weight of the spike during the growth phase of the spike”
The same questions in other papers
density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.