Paper · 2007 · Plant Production Science

No-Tillage Enhanced the Dependence on Surface Irrigation Water in Wheat and Soybean

Morio Iijima; Satoru Morita; Walter Zegada-Lizarazu; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

No-tillage often affects crop root development due to the higher mechanical impedance to root elongation, resulting in yield reduction under an unfavorable rainfall pattern, such as drought. In this study, we analyzed the changes in water source of wheat and soybean under drought stress in a continuous no-tillage field. Deuterium-labeled irrigation water was applied at different growth stages of crops to analyze their water uptake pattern. Mechanical impedance of the surface soil was 3.5 and 4.4 times higher in the no-tillage than in the conventional tillage under wet and drought conditions, respectively. Root length density and root branching index (the length of lateral roots per unit axile root length) of soybean in the surface soil layer were higher in the no-tillage field. This indicates that the increased branching by the higher mechanical impedance of undisturbed surface soil causes roots to accumulate in the surface soil layer. The deuterium concentration in the xylem sap of both crops was significantly higher in the no-tillage than in the tillage under a drought condition. This indicates that the crops in the no-tillage field depend highly on the newly supplied easily accessible water (irrigation water and/or rainfall) as compared with those in the conventional tillage field under a limited water supply. In conclusion, enhanced surface root growth in the no-tillage condition would result in higher dependence on surface supplied irrigation water than in the conventional tillage under drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface-soil mechanical impedance under no-tillage was 3.5 times higher than conventional tillage when wet.

Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
Mechanical impedance of the surface soile0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.5e0
Qualifier
wete0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical impedance of the surface soil was 3.5 and 4.4 times higher in the no-tillage than in the conventional tillage under wet and drought conditions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface-soil mechanical impedance under no-tillage was 4.4 times higher than conventional tillage during drought.

Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
Mechanical impedance of the surface soile0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.4e0
Qualifier
drought conditionse0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical impedance of the surface soil was 3.5 and 4.4 times higher in the no-tillage than in the conventional tillage under wet and drought conditions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–611 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean surface root length density and branching index were higher under no-tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
no-tillage fielde0
Outcome
Root length density and root branching indexe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root length density and root branching index (the length of lateral roots per unit axile root length) of soybean in the surface soil layer were higher in the no-tillage field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat xylem sap deuterium concentration was significantly higher under no-tillage than tillage during drought.

Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
deuterium concentration in the xylem sape0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
drought conditione0
Comparator
tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The deuterium concentration in the xylem sap of both crops was significantly higher in the no-tillage than in the tillage under a drought condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean xylem sap deuterium concentration was significantly higher under no-tillage than tillage during drought.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no-tillagee0
Outcome
deuterium concentration in the xylem sape0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
drought conditione0
Comparator
tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The deuterium concentration in the xylem sap of both crops was significantly higher in the no-tillage than in the tillage under a drought condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–83 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat and soybean under no-tillage depended more on newly supplied surface water during limited water supply.

Taxon
Wheat and SoybeanGlycine maxTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
no-tillage fielde0
Outcome
depend highly on the newly supplied easily accessible watere0
Qualifier
under a limited water supplye0
Comparator
conventional tillage fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the crops in the no-tillage field depend highly on the newly supplied easily accessible water (irrigation water and/or rainfall) as compared with those in the conventional tillage field under a limited water supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–83 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

84 papers: 52 positive, 32 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.