Paper · 2002 · Journal of Tree Fruit Production

GA and Ethephon Have Limited Effect on Secondary Bloom in ‘Bartlett’ Pear

Renae E. Moran; Stephen M. Southwick; Kitren Glozer; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

GA 3 , GA 4+7 + BA or ethephon was applied in the spring or summer 1997, 1998 and 1999 to reduce secondary bloom in 'Bartlett' pear (Pyrus communis L.). Reduction of secondary bloom could reduce associated fire blight (Erwinia amylovora [Burrill] Winslow et al.) infections. The number of Type I secondary bloom was reduced by 400 mg?L 21 GA 3 , applied between 33 and 97 DAFB, dates which also reduced normal bloom and fruit set. Summer timings of GA 3 at 100 mg?L 21 or GA 4+7 + BA at 200 mg?L 21 reduced the number of Type V secondary bloom with no difference between GA 3 and GA 4+7 . Ethephon applied one month after harvest in 1997 and 1998 reduced Type Vs in 1998 but not in 1999. Ethephon also reduced fruit set in 1999. Use of GAs to reduce Type V secondary bloom in a fire blight management program may be possible.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 400 mg?L 21 reduced Type I secondary bloom.

Treatment
400 mg?L 21 GA 3e0
Outcome
number of Type I secondary bloome0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
between 33 and 97 DAFBe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of Type I secondary bloom was reduced by 400 mg?L 21 GA 3 , applied between 33 and 97 DAFB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Those GA3 dates also reduced normal bloom and fruit set.

Treatment
400 mg?L 21 GA 3e1
Outcome
normal bloom and fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dates which also reduced normal bloom and fruit set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–429 · show in text ↑
e1

“400 mg?L 21 GA 3 , applied between 33 and 97 DAFB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer GA3 reduced Type V secondary bloom.

Treatment
GA 3 at 100 mg?L 21e0
Outcome
number of Type V secondary bloome0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Summer timings of GA 3 at 100 mg?L 21 or GA 4+7 + BA at 200 mg?L 21 reduced the number of Type V secondary bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer GA4+7 plus BA reduced Type V secondary bloom.

Treatment
GA 4+7 + BA at 200 mg?L 21e0
Outcome
number of Type V secondary bloome0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Summer timings of GA 3 at 100 mg?L 21 or GA 4+7 + BA at 200 mg?L 21 reduced the number of Type V secondary bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two summer gibberellin treatments did not differ in Type V secondary bloom.

Treatment
GA 3e0
Outcome
number of Type V secondary bloome1
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
GA 4+7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no difference between GA 3 and GA 4+7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–586 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduced the number of Type V secondary bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest ethephon reduced Type V secondary bloom in 1998.

Treatment
Ethephon applied one month after harveste0
Outcome
Type Vse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in 1998e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon applied one month after harvest in 1997 and 1998 reduced Type Vs in 1998 but not in 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest ethephon did not reduce Type V secondary bloom in 1999.

Treatment
Ethephon applied one month after harveste0
Outcome
Type Vse0
Direction
note0
Qualifier
in 1999e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon applied one month after harvest in 1997 and 1998 reduced Type Vs in 1998 but not in 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon reduced fruit set in 1999.

Treatment
Ethephone0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in 1999e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon also reduced fruit set in 1999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Results differ

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.