Gibberellic acid · Yield · Pyrus communis (pear)
15 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 3
3 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- GA and Ethephon Have Limited Effect on Secondary Bloom in ‘Bartlett’ Pear (2002)
decreaseThose GA3 dates also reduced normal bloom and fruit set.
Gibberellin-induced Parthenocarpy in ‘Winter Nelis’ Pear1 (1972)increaseGA 3 (200 ppm) applied to bagged blossoms stimulated fruit set and growth for about a month.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Plant growth regulators increase the fruit size of ‘Spadona’ and ‘Coscia’ pears (Pyrus communis) in a warm climate (2007)
no changeGA3 alone did not increase pear fruit size.
Effect of hormone treatments on deformed fruit development in pear (2012)increaseGA3 at 2.7% enhanced fruit growth and final size.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Plant growth regulators increase the fruit size of ‘Spadona’ and ‘Coscia’ pears (Pyrus communis) in a warm climate (2007)
no changeGA3 alone did not increase pear fruit size.
Gibberellin-induced Parthenocarpy in ‘Winter Nelis’ Pear1 (1972)increaseGA 3 (200 ppm) applied to bagged blossoms stimulated fruit set and growth for about a month.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 0 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 10
Gibberellin-induced Parthenocarpy in ‘Winter Nelis’ Pear1 · 1972
- positive
- positive
REDUCING SECONDARY FLOWERING IN BARTLETT PEAR TO REDUCE FIRE BLIGHT · 2002
- positive
Effect of different chemicals on the improvement of fruit set in soft pear cv. punjab beauty · 2005
- positive
Fruit set and quality improvement studies on semi-soft pear cv. Punjab Beauty · 2012
- positive
- positive
Effects of Different Types of Gibberellic Acid on Yield and Quality of Pear · 2012
- positive
Effect of hormone treatments on deformed fruit development in pear · 2012
- positive
Development of parthenocarpic fruits in the pear (Pyrus communis) cultivar Conference · 2013
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
- negative
GA and Ethephon Have Limited Effect on Secondary Bloom in ‘Bartlett’ Pear · 2002
- negative
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.