Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GA3 increased pear fruit set relative to other hormonal treatments.

A claim from Development of parthenocarpic fruits in the pear (Pyrus communis) cultivar Conference · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 increased pear fruit set relative to other hormonal treatments.

Taxon
Pyrus communisPyrus communist0
Treatment
Gibberellins (GA3)e0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other hormonal treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gibberellins (GA3) increased the fruit set compared to the other hormonal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1354
t0

“pear (Pyrus communis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–65

Title

Development of parthenocarpic fruits in the pear (Pyrus communis) cultivar Conference

Muriel Quinet; Christel Buyens; Anne‐Laure Jacquemart DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) 2013

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-4e989068302c4e0bb50169589a48b37e176cdbb20641e372f8819c818785bf96 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

class · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.