Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Gibberellin treatments could increase the parthenocarpic fruit set of pear under adverse weather conditions.

A claim from DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POLLINATION AND PARTHENOCARPY IN THE 'CONFERENCE' PEAR PRODUCTION · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin treatments could increase the parthenocarpic fruit set of pear under adverse weather conditions.

Treatment
Gibberellin treatmentse0
Outcome
parthenocarpic fruit sete0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
under adverse weather conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gibberellin treatments could also increase the parthenocarpic fruit set under adverse weather conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1525
t0

“PEAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73

Title

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN POLLINATION AND PARTHENOCARPY IN THE 'CONFERENCE' PEAR PRODUCTION

M. Quinet; A.-L. Jacquemart Acta Horticulturae 2015. doi:10.17660/actahortic.2015.1094.45

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-835dbe466b9ca6b57a7eac9aaa2db691eb58ff3c0d0a5af86dd37afc05204010 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

class · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.