Paper · 1984 · Transactions of the ASAE

Tillage Effects on Crop Yield in Coastal Plain Soils

C. R. Camp; G. D. Christenbury; C. W. Doty

10
claims
11
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT CORN {Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were grown on an 18-ha site of Coastal Plain soils under nonirrigated and irrigated conditions for the three-year period, 1979-81. The five tillage treatments were double disking and minimum tillage, both with and without in-row subsoiling at planting; and disking with uniform chisel plowing. Rainfall during the growing season was near normal in 1979, below normal in 1981, and much below normal in 1980. There were significant yield differences due to tillage and irrigation for both corn and soybean. Corn yield increases due to deep tillage were greater in magnitude and were more consistent than those for soybean. Minimum tillage without subsoiling produced the lowest yields for both corn and soybean; however, this treatment had the poorest stand and the most severe weed competition of all treatments. Deep tillage and irrigation produced additive yield increases for corn, but not for soybean, indicating the possible need to use both management practices for corn in some soil conditions. Irrigation increased yields for both corn and soybean across all tillage treatments with mean yield increases of 3.37 t/ha (86%) and 0.73 t/ha (51%) for corn and soybean, respectively. The choice of management practices will depend upon their cost relative to their respective yield increase potential.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and irrigation significantly affected corn yield.

Treatment
tillage and irrigatione0
Outcome
yield differencese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant yield differences due to tillage and irrigation for both corn and soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage and irrigation significantly affected soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
tillage and irrigatione0
Outcome
yield differencese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant yield differences due to tillage and irrigation for both corn and soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield increases from deep tillage were greater and more consistent than soybean increases.

Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
soybeane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yield increases due to deep tillage were greater in magnitude and were more consistent than those for soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage without subsoiling gave the lowest corn yield.

Treatment
Minimum tillage without subsoilinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum tillage without subsoiling produced the lowest yields for both corn and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage without subsoiling gave the lowest soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Minimum tillage without subsoilinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum tillage without subsoiling produced the lowest yields for both corn and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–773 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The minimum tillage without subsoiling treatment had the poorest stand and most severe weed competition.

Outcome
poorest stand and the most severe weed competitione0
Direction
pooreste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment had the poorest stand and the most severe weed competition of all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Crop Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage and irrigation gave additive corn yield increases.

Treatment
Deep tillage and irrigatione0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage and irrigation produced additive yield increases for corn, but not for soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage and irrigation did not give additive soybean yield increases.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Deep tillage and irrigatione0
Outcome
additive yield increasese0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage and irrigation produced additive yield increases for corn, but not for soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised mean corn yield by 3.37 t/ha (86%) across tillage treatments.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.37 t/ha (86%)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased yields for both corn and soybean across all tillage treatments with mean yield increases of 3.37 t/ha (86%) and 0.73 t/ha (51%) for corn and soybean, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation raised mean soybean yield by 0.73 t/ha (51%) across tillage treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.73 t/ha (51%)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased yields for both corn and soybean across all tillage treatments with mean yield increases of 3.37 t/ha (86%) and 0.73 t/ha (51%) for corn and soybean, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1250 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 264 positive, 79 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.