Paper · 1994 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Stimulatory effects of aluminum on the growth of cultured roots of tea

Masaki Tsuji; Toru Kuboi; Shigeki Konishi

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of Al on the growth of excised tea (Camellia sinensis L.) roots differentiated from stem segments in vitro was investigated in shaking liquid culture.1) The optimum initial pH for tea root growth in modified MS medium was 5.5.Growth of main and lateral roots was affected by the difference in N AA concentrations.Main root growth was stimulated by 5X10-7 and 1X10-6 M N AA, and lateral root growth was stimulated by 5 X 10-6 and 1 X 10-5 M N AA.2) Main root growth showed a progressive increase for 3 weeks, then became stationary.Lateral roots began to grow at 2 weeks, with a progressive increase over the following 6 weeks.3) The growth of the tea roots in the main or lateral root growth medium was stimulated by the supply of Al and P together, but was not affected when Al and P were supplied separately.4) The pH of the culture medium decreased gradually to about 4.0 during the shaking culture, and remained stable.Growth of roots supplied with Al was stimulated after the decrease of medium pH, but when the Al supply ceased, growth stopped.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea root growth was optimal at initial pH 5.5.

Taxon
teae0
Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
tea root growthe0
Value
5.5e0

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum initial pH for tea root growth in modified MS medium was 5.5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main root growth was stimulated by 5X10-7 and 1X10-6 M N AA.

Taxon
teat0
Organ / stage
Main roote0
Treatment
5X10-7 and 1X10-6 M N AAe0
Outcome
Main root growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Main root growth was stimulated by 5X10-7 and 1X10-6 M N AA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–383 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lateral root growth was stimulated by 5 X 10-6 and 1 X 10-5 M N AA.

Taxon
teat0
Organ / stage
lateral roote0
Treatment
5 X 10-6 and 1 X 10-5 M N AAe0
Outcome
lateral root growthe0
Direction
stimulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“lateral root growth was stimulated by 5 X 10-6 and 1 X 10-5 M N AA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main root growth rose for three weeks and then became stationary.

Taxon
teat0
Outcome
Main root growthe0
Direction
progressive increasee0
Value
3 weekse0

Verbatim

e0

“Main root growth showed a progressive increase for 3 weeks, then became stationary.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lateral roots began growing at two weeks and increased over the following six weeks.

Taxon
teat0
Outcome
Lateral rootse0
Direction
progressive increasee0
Value
6 weekse0

Verbatim

e0

“Lateral roots began to grow at 2 weeks, with a progressive increase over the following 6 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al and P together stimulated tea root growth.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
Al and P togethere0
Outcome
growth of the tea rootse0
Direction
stimulatede0
Comparator
Al and P were supplied separatelye0

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of the tea roots in the main or lateral root growth medium was stimulated by the supply of Al and P together, but was not affected when Al and P were supplied separately.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al and P supplied separately did not affect tea root growth.

Taxon
teae0
Treatment
Al and P were supplied separatelye0
Outcome
growth of the tea rootse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The growth of the tea roots in the main or lateral root growth medium was stimulated by the supply of Al and P together, but was not affected when Al and P were supplied separately.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–821 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culture medium pH fell to about 4.0 and stabilized.

Taxon
teat0
Outcome
pH of the culture mediume0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
about 4.0e0

Verbatim

e0

“The pH of the culture medium decreased gradually to about 4.0 during the shaking culture, and remained stable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea roots supplied with Al grew more after medium pH fell.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
Growth of rootse0
Direction
stimulatede0
Qualifier
after the decrease of medium pHe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Growth of roots supplied with Al was stimulated after the decrease of medium pH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth stopped when Al supply ceased.

Taxon
teat0
Treatment
Al supply ceasede0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
stoppede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“when the Al supply ceased, growth stopped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–70 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results differ

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.