Paper · 1994 · Canadian Journal of Botany

Structural changes in rapid-cycling Brassica rapa selected for differential waterlogging tolerance

Christine J. Daugherty; Sharon W. Matthews; Mary E. Musgrave

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two populations of rapid-cycling Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance and a commercially available standard population were compared in their structural responses to waterlogging. Rates of dry matter accrual were similar under drained conditions but were lower after 6 days of waterlogging, especially in the sensitive population. Chlorophyll content of leaves from the sensitive population was significantly lower than the tolerant population. Examination of the foliage by TEM after 4 days of waterlogging revealed large starch grains that apparently disrupted the grana stacks in the sensitive population. Root morphology also distinguished the populations. After 8 days of waterlogging, numerous adventitious roots were visible in the standard and tolerant populations but not in the sensitive population. No aerenchyma was detected by examination of root cross sections. Mitochondrial morphology was affected by waterlogging, resulting in elongate, branched organelles. Isozyme analysis of malic enzyme, malate dehydrogenase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and pyruvate decarboxylase revealed no differences due to population, treatment, or duration. Isozymes of alcohol dehydrogenase varied with duration of waterlogging, and isozyme forms of phosphoglucomutase were distinct depending on the population. The appearance of stress-specific structural features in populations of B. rapa is discussed in relation to differences in waterlogging tolerance. Key words: hypoxia, isozymes, aerenchyma, adventitious roots, waterlogging, starch.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accrual was lower after 6 days of waterlogging, especially in the sensitive population

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Material
sensitive populatione1
Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
dry matter accruale1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
after 6 dayse1
Comparator
drained conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rates of dry matter accrual were similar under drained conditions but were lower after 6 days of waterlogging, especially in the sensitive population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter accrual was similar under drained conditions

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Outcome
dry matter accruale1
Qualifier
similar under drained conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rates of dry matter accrual were similar under drained conditions but were lower after 6 days of waterlogging, especially in the sensitive population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–358 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content of leaves was significantly lower in the sensitive than in the tolerant population

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Material
sensitive populatione2
Organ / stage
leavese2
Outcome
Chlorophyll contente2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
tolerant populatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chlorophyll content of leaves from the sensitive population was significantly lower than the tolerant population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–472 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 4 days of waterlogging, large starch grains apparently disrupted grana stacks in the sensitive population

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Material
sensitive populatione3
Treatment
waterlogginge4
Outcome
grana stackse3
Qualifier
large starch grainse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“large starch grains that apparently disrupted the grana stacks in the sensitive population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–636 · show in text ↑
e4

“after 4 days of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–536 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adventitious roots were visible after 8 days of waterlogging in standard and tolerant populations but not in the sensitive population

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Material
standard and tolerant populationse5
Treatment
waterlogginge6
Outcome
adventitious rootse5
Comparator
sensitive populatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e5

“numerous adventitious roots were visible in the standard and tolerant populations but not in the sensitive population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–837 · show in text ↑
e6

“After 8 days of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No aerenchyma was detected in root cross sections

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Organ / stage
root cross sectionse7
Outcome
aerenchymae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e7

“No aerenchyma was detected by examination of root cross sections”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–903 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging altered mitochondrial morphology into elongate, branched organelles

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
Mitochondrial morphologye1
Qualifier
elongate, branched organellese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mitochondrial morphology was affected by waterlogging, resulting in elongate, branched organelles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1002 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Malic enzyme, malate dehydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase isozymes showed no differences

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Gene
malic enzyme, malate dehydrogenase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenasee1
Outcome
Isozyme analysise1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Isozyme analysis of malic enzyme, malate dehydrogenase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and pyruvate decarboxylase revealed no differences due to population, treatment, or duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1187 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyruvate decarboxylase isozymes showed no differences

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Gene
pyruvate decarboxylasee1
Outcome
Isozyme analysise1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Isozyme analysis of malic enzyme, malate dehydrogenase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and pyruvate decarboxylase revealed no differences due to population, treatment, or duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1004–1187 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcohol dehydrogenase isozymes varied with duration of waterlogging

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Treatment
duration of waterlogginge1
Gene
alcohol dehydrogenasee1
Outcome
Isozymese1
Direction
variede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“Isozymes of alcohol dehydrogenase varied with duration of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1259 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphoglucomutase isozyme forms were distinct between populations

Taxon
Brassica rapaBrassica rapae0
Gene
phosphoglucomutasee1
Outcome
isozyme formse1
Qualifier
depending on the populatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa
Brassica rapa · TaxonAris riyanto · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica rapa L. selected for differential waterlogging tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 33–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“isozyme forms of phosphoglucomutase were distinct depending on the population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1342 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.