Paper · 2015 · HortScience

Simulated Seawater Flooding Reduces the Growth of Ten Vegetables

Youping Sun; Joseph Masabni; Genhua Niu

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Excessive salinity in soil and irrigation water in combination with waterlogging in coastal regions can significantly reduce the productivity of many agricultural crops. To evaluate the plant growth responses to simulated seawater (SSW) flooding, seedlings of 10 vegetables (broccoli, chinese cabbage, chinese greens, cucumber, eggplant, kale, radish, ‘Red Crunchy’ radish, spinach, and tomato) were flooded with SSW at electrical conductivity (EC) of 44.0 ± 1.3 dS·m −1 or tap water at EC of 0.8 ± 0.1 dS·m −1 for 24 hours and grown subsequently for 2 weeks in a greenhouse. Chinese greens and cucumber plants died shortly after flooding with SSW, whereas other vegetables exhibited various degrees of visible salt damage. Chinese cabbage suffered the strongest reduction, whereas spinach, tomato, and eggplant exhibited the least decrease in dry weight (DW) due to SSW flooding in comparison with their perspective control. Two weeks after flooding treatment with SSW, net photosynthetic rate of broccoli, kale, spinach, and tomato was reduced by 43% to 67%, transpiration rate by 35% to 66%, and stomatal conductance ( g S ) by 51% to 82%. In summary, spinach, eggplant, and tomato were the most tolerant, whereas chinese cabbage, chinese greens, and cucumber were the least tolerant to SSW flooding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese greens died shortly after SSW flooding.

Taxon
Chinese greense0
Treatment
flooding with SSWe0
Outcome
diede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Chinese greens and cucumber plants died shortly after flooding with SSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber plants died shortly after SSW flooding.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
flooding with SSWe0
Outcome
diede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chinese greens and cucumber plants died shortly after flooding with SSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–647 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other vegetables showed varied visible salt damage.

Taxon
vegetablese0
Outcome
visible salt damagee0
Qualifier
various degreese0

Verbatim

e0

“other vegetables exhibited various degrees of visible salt damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–723 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese cabbage showed the strongest dry-weight reduction.

Treatment
SSW floodinge1
Outcome
dry weighte2
Direction
strongest reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis
Brassica rapa subsp. pekinensis · Taxondekochan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chinese cabbage suffered the strongest reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–772 · show in text ↑
e1

“due to SSW flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–879 · show in text ↑
e2

“dry weight (DW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach, tomato and eggplant had the least dry-weight decreases.

Treatment
SSW floodinge0
Outcome
dry weight (DW)e0
Direction
least decreasee0
Comparator
their perspective controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinach, tomato, and eggplant exhibited the least decrease in dry weight (DW) due to SSW flooding in comparison with their perspective control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate declined by 43% to 67% in broccoli, kale, spinach and tomato.

Treatment
SSWe1
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
43% to 67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net photosynthetic rate of broccoli, kale, spinach, and tomato was reduced by 43% to 67%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1059 · show in text ↑
e1

“flooding with SSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration rate declined by 35% to 66% in those vegetables.

Treatment
SSWe2
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
35% to 66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transpiration rate by 35% to 66%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1093 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli, kale, spinach, and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“flooding with SSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance declined by 51% to 82%.

Treatment
SSWe2
Outcome
stomatal conductance ( g S )e0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
51% to 82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal conductance ( g S ) by 51% to 82%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1141 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli, kale, spinach, and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“flooding with SSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–647 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach, eggplant and tomato were most tolerant to SSW flooding.

Outcome
most tolerante0
Direction
most tolerante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spinach, eggplant, and tomato were the most tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1207 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese cabbage, Chinese greens and cucumber were least tolerant.

Taxon
chinese cabbage, chinese greens, and cucumbere0
Outcome
least tolerante0
Direction
least tolerante0

Verbatim

e0

“chinese cabbage, chinese greens, and cucumber were the least tolerant to SSW flooding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1303 · show in text ↑

flooding · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

22 papers: 4 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

flooding · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

flooding · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

flooding · growth · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.