Abstract
Tomato accessions PI 128644 (Lycopersicon peruvianum var. dentatum Mill.) and PI 406966 (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) were identified in preliminary screening trials as being relatively nonresistant and resistant to 120 hr of flooding, respectively. Many adventitious roots (AR) developed on the lower stems of flooded PI 406966 seedlings, while few formed on flooded PI 128644 plants. Root formation by flooded PI 406966 seedlings depended on de novo initiation rather than emergence of preformed initials. Hypocotyl porosity of PI 406966 plants increased from between 3% and 6% to 8% by 36 and 72 hr of flooding, respectively. Porosity of PI 128644 hypocotyls was unchanged by 72 hr of inundation. Flooding did not affect the secondary root porosity of either accession. The limited capacity of PI 128644 seedlings to develop AR and aerenchyma was not related to an inability to synthesize 1-aminocyclopropane-l.carboxylic acid or ethylene in response to hypoxia. Chemical name used: 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Flooded PI 406966 seedlings developed many adventitious roots on the lower stem, whereas flooded PI 128644 developed few.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- PI 406966e1
- Organ / stage
- lower stemse1
- Treatment
- floodede1
- Outcome
- adventitious roots (AR)e1
- Direction
- Manye1
- Comparator
- PI 128644e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Adaptive Stem and Adventitious Root Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Flooding”
e1“Many adventitious roots (AR) developed on the lower stems of flooded PI 406966 seedlings, while few formed on flooded PI 128644 plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Hypocotyl porosity of PI 406966 increased to 8% after 36 and 72 hr of flooding, from 3% to 6%.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- PI 406966e2
- Organ / stage
- Hypocotyle2
- Treatment
- 36 and 72 hr of floodinge2
- Outcome
- Hypocotyl porositye2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Value
- 8%e2
- Comparator
- between 3% and 6%e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Adaptive Stem and Adventitious Root Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Flooding”
e2“Hypocotyl porosity of PI 406966 plants increased from between 3% and 6% to 8% by 36 and 72 hr of flooding, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Hypocotyl porosity of PI 128644 was unchanged after 72 hr of inundation.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- PI 128644e3
- Organ / stage
- hypocotylse3
- Treatment
- 72 hr of inundatione3
- Outcome
- Porositye3
- Direction
- unchangede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Adaptive Stem and Adventitious Root Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Flooding”
e3“Porosity of PI 128644 hypocotyls was unchanged by 72 hr of inundation”
Claim · model-written summary
Flooding did not affect secondary root porosity in either tomato accession.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- either accessione4
- Organ / stage
- secondary roote4
- Treatment
- Floodinge4
- Outcome
- secondary root porositye4
- Direction
- did not affecte4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Adaptive Stem and Adventitious Root Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Flooding”
e4“Flooding did not affect the secondary root porosity of either accession”
Claim · model-written summary
The limited adventitious root and aerenchyma capacity of PI 128644 was not related to ethylene synthesis under hypoxia.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- PI 128644e5
- Treatment
- hypoxiae5
- Compound
- ethylenee5
- Outcome
- limited capacity of PI 128644 seedlings to develop AR and aerenchymae5
- Direction
- not relatede5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Adaptive Stem and Adventitious Root Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Flooding”
e5“The limited capacity of PI 128644 seedlings to develop AR and aerenchyma was not related to an inability to synthesize 1-aminocyclopropane-l.carboxylic acid or ethylene in response to hypoxia”
Claim · model-written summary
Root formation by flooded PI 406966 seedlings depended on de novo initiation rather than emergence of preformed initials.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- PI 406966e6
- Outcome
- Root formation by flooded PI 406966 seedlingse6
- Qualifier
- depended on de novo initiation rather than emergence of preformed initialse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Adaptive Stem and Adventitious Root Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Flooding”
e6“Root formation by flooded PI 406966 seedlings depended on de novo initiation rather than emergence of preformed initials”
Claim · model-written summary
In preliminary screening, PI 406966 was resistant to 120 hr of flooding, whereas PI 128644 was relatively nonresistant.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Material
- PI 406966e0
- Outcome
- resistant to 120 hr of floodinge0
- Qualifier
- relatively nonresistante0
- Comparator
- PI 128644e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Adaptive Stem and Adventitious Root Responses of Two Tomato Genotypes to Flooding”
e0“Tomato accessions PI 128644 (Lycopersicon peruvianum var. dentatum Mill.) and PI 406966 (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) were identified in preliminary screening trials as being relatively nonresistant and resistant to 120 hr of flooding, respectively”
The same questions in other papers
flooding · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →flooding · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.