Paper · 2015 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Residual Effect of Zinc Application Doses and Methods on Nutrition and Productivity of Corn

Gabriela Furtado Mari; Renato de M. Prado; Anelisa de Aquino Vidal Lacerda Soares; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Zinc is the micronutrient that presents the greatest response in corn grain production. However, the mode of application and the dose used are decisive factors with respect to fertilizer efficiency in the crop. Thus, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the residual effect of zinc application methods and rates on corn nutrition and productivity. The experiment was conducted in the experimental area of the Teaching, Research and Production Farm of the FCAV/UNESP. Soil in the area is classified as dystrophic Dark-Red Latosol (dRL). The experimental setup consisted of a randomized complete block design with four replications. Treatments included three localized Zn doses applied to the soil (planting row); three Zn doses incorporated into the soil at depth of 0 - 20 cm; foliar application, seed application and treatment without addition of Zn. Two evaluations of growth during cultivation were performed. Grain productivity of the crop and the zinc content in soil, leaves and seeds were evaluated. Foliar spraying with Zn simultaneously promoted increased leaf Zn content and basal diameter of the plant. The Zn contents in grains and in the soil, as well as grain yield, were not affected by the Zn application methods or the applied doses. The residual effect of incorporated Zn doses was observed only in the basal diameter and number of leaves at 60 days after emergence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc spraying increased corn leaf zinc content.

Treatment
Foliar spraying with Zne0
Outcome
leaf Zn contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying with Zn simultaneously promoted increased leaf Zn content and basal diameter of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc spraying increased corn basal diameter.

Treatment
Foliar spraying with Zne0
Outcome
basal diametere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spraying with Zn simultaneously promoted increased leaf Zn content and basal diameter of the plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application methods or doses did not affect zinc content in corn grains and soil.

Treatment
Zn application methods or the applied dosese0
Outcome
Zn contents in grains and in the soile0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn contents in grains and in the soil, as well as grain yield, were not affected by the Zn application methods or the applied doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application methods or doses did not affect corn grain yield.

Treatment
Zn application methods or the applied dosese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn contents in grains and in the soil, as well as grain yield, were not affected by the Zn application methods or the applied doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual incorporated zinc affected corn basal diameter and leaf number at 60 days after emergence.

Treatment
incorporated Zn dosese0
Outcome
basal diameter and number of leavese0
Qualifier
60 days after emergencee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effect of incorporated Zn doses was observed only in the basal diameter and number of leaves at 60 days after emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

224 papers: 183 positive, 41 negative or no effect

182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

220 papers more in this group

See all 224 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

235 papers: 199 positive, 36 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

231 papers more in this group

See all 235 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 391 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

application · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

337 papers: 310 positive, 27 negative or no effect

309 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

333 papers more in this group

See all 337 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.