Abstract
Three maize inbred lines (Os86-39, Os89-35 and Os87-24) were grown in pots with Eutric Cambisol using 9 fertilisation variants (control 10 kg/ha Zn - on soil surface; 5 kg/ha - foliar application; 61 kg/ha P; 61 kg/ha P and 10 kg/ha Zn - on soil surface; 61 kg/ha P and 5 kg/ha Zn - foliar application; 183 kg/ha P; 183 kg/ha P and 10 kg/ha Zn - on soil surface; 183 kg/ha P and 5 kg/ha Zn - foliar application). The effects of phosphorus and zinc fertilisation on the dry matter yield, plant height, stalk diameter as well as phosphorus and zinc concentrations in ear-leaves were investigated. Significant differences were found between the lines in all parameters investigated except for phosphorus concentration. Line Os87-24 was characterised by the best results in the total biomass production. Zinc fertilisation decreased while phosphorus fertilisation increased total plant dry matter mass. Phosphorus fertilisation increased its concentration in the ear-leaves. Zinc fertilisation, especially foliar, resulted in Zn concentration increase in the ear-leaf of the lines investigated.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Maize inbred lines differed significantly in dry matter yield.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were found between the lines in all parameters investigated except for phosphorus concentration”
e1“the dry matter yield, plant height, stalk diameter as well as phosphorus and zinc concentrations in ear-leaves”
t0“maize lines (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize inbred lines differed significantly in plant height and stalk diameter.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were found between the lines in all parameters investigated except for phosphorus concentration”
e1“the dry matter yield, plant height, stalk diameter as well as phosphorus and zinc concentrations in ear-leaves”
t0“maize lines (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize inbred lines differed significantly in ear-leaf zinc concentration.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were found between the lines in all parameters investigated except for phosphorus concentration”
e1“phosphorus and zinc concentrations in ear-leaves”
t0“maize lines (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize inbred lines did not differ significantly in phosphorus concentration.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Significant differences were found between the lines in all parameters investigated except for phosphorus concentration”
t0“maize lines (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Line Os87-24 had the best total biomass production.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Line Os87-24 was characterised by the best results in the total biomass production”
t0“maize lines (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc fertilization decreased total maize dry matter mass.
- Treatment
- Zinc fertilisatione0
- Outcome
- total plant dry matter masse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Zinc fertilisation decreased while phosphorus fertilisation increased total plant dry matter mass”
e1“9 fertilisation variants (control 10 kg/ha Zn”
t0“maize lines (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilization increased total maize dry matter mass.
- Treatment
- phosphorus fertilisatione0
- Outcome
- total plant dry matter masse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Zinc fertilisation decreased while phosphorus fertilisation increased total plant dry matter mass”
e1“9 fertilisation variants (control 10 kg/ha Zn”
t0“maize lines (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus fertilization increased ear-leaf phosphorus concentration.
- Treatment
- Phosphorus fertilisatione0
- Outcome
- its concentration in the ear-leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Phosphorus fertilisation increased its concentration in the ear-leaves”
e1“9 fertilisation variants (control 10 kg/ha Zn”
t0“maize lines (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc fertilization, especially foliar application, increased zinc concentration in maize ear-leaves.
- Treatment
- Zinc fertilisation, especially foliare0
- Outcome
- Zn concentratione0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Zinc fertilisation, especially foliar, resulted in Zn concentration increase in the ear-leaf of the lines investigated”
e1“9 fertilisation variants (control 10 kg/ha Zn”
t0“maize lines (Zea mays L.)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 183 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
220 papers more in this group
See all 224 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
231 papers more in this group
See all 235 papers →application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
242 papers more in this group
See all 246 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,025 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,160 papers more in this group
See all 1,164 papers →fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,361 papers more in this group
See all 1,365 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.