Paper · 2019 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Root trait plasticity and plant nutrient acquisition in phosphorus limited soil

Amit Kumar; Muhammad Shahbaz; Manisha Koirala; et al.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
61
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract To overcome soil nutrient limitation, many plants have developed complex nutrient acquisition strategies including altering root morphology, root hair formation or colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). The interactions of these strategies and their plasticity are, however, affected by soil nutrient status throughout plant growth. Such plasticity is decisive for plant phosphorus (P) acquisition in P‐limited soils. We investigated the P acquisition strategies and their plasticity of two maize genotypes characterized by the presence or absence of root hairs. We hypothesized that in the absence of root hairs plant growth is facilitated by traits with complementary functions, e.g ., by higher root mycorrhizal colonization. This dependence on complementary traits will decrease in P fertilized soils. At early growth stages, root hairs are of little benefit for nutrient uptake. Regardless of the presence or absence of root hairs, plants produced average root biomass of 0.14 g per plant and exhibited 23% root mycorrhizal colonization. At later growth stages of maize, contrasting mechanisms with functional complementarity explained similar plant biomass production under P limitation: the presence of root hairs versus higher root mycorrhizal colonization (67%) favored by increased fine root diameter in absence of root hairs. P fertilization decreased the dependence of plant on specific root traits for nutrient acquisition. Through root trait plasticity, plants can minimize trade‐offs for developing and maintaining functional traits, while increasing the benefit in terms of nutrient acquisition and plant growth. The present study highlights the plasticity of functional root traits for efficient nutrient acquisition strategies in agricultural systems with low nutrient availability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both maize genotypes averaged 0.14 g root biomass at early growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
root hairse0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Value
0.14 g per plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Root trait plasticity and plant nutrient acquisition in phosphorus limited soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Regardless of the presence or absence of root hairs, plants produced average root biomass of 0.14 g per plant and exhibited 23% root mycorrhizal colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize genotypes characterized by the presence or absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–583 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both maize genotypes had 23% root mycorrhizal colonization early.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)e2symbiont
Outcome
root mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Value
23%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of the presence or absence of root hairs, plants produced average root biomass of 0.14 g per plant and exhibited 23% root mycorrhizal colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1063 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize genotypes characterized by the presence or absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–583 · show in text ↑
e2

“colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–223 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root hairs gave little nutrient-uptake benefit early.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
root hairse0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
little benefite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At early growth stages, root hairs are of little benefit for nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize genotypes characterized by the presence or absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–583 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In later P-limited growth, root hairs and mycorrhizal colonization complemented one another to yield similar biomass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
root hairse0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)e2symbiont
Outcome
similar plant biomass productione0
Qualifier
functional complementaritye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At later growth stages of maize, contrasting mechanisms with functional complementarity explained similar plant biomass production under P limitation: the presence of root hairs versus higher root mycorrhizal colonization (67%) favored by increased fine root diameter in absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize genotypes characterized by the presence or absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–583 · show in text ↑
e2

“colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without root hairs, later root mycorrhizal colonization reached 67%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
root hairse0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)e2symbiont
Outcome
root mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
67%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher root mycorrhizal colonization (67%) favored by increased fine root diameter in absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize genotypes characterized by the presence or absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–583 · show in text ↑
e2

“colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–223 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased fine-root diameter favored colonization without root hairs.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
fine root diametere0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)e2symbiont
Outcome
root mycorrhizal colonizatione0
Qualifier
absence of root hairse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher root mycorrhizal colonization (67%) favored by increased fine root diameter in absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize genotypes characterized by the presence or absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–583 · show in text ↑
e2

“colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilization decreased dependence on specific root traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
P fertilizatione0
Outcome
dependence of plant on specific root traitse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P fertilization decreased the dependence of plant on specific root traits for nutrient acquisition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1457 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize genotypes characterized by the presence or absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–583 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-trait plasticity can minimize trait tradeoffs and increase nutrient acquisition and growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
nutrient acquisition and plant growthe0
Direction
increasinge0
Qualifier
root trait plasticitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Through root trait plasticity, plants can minimize trade‐offs for developing and maintaining functional traits, while increasing the benefit in terms of nutrient acquisition and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1649 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize genotypes characterized by the presence or absence of root hairs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–583 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.