Paper · 1957 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Studies on peach sick soil. (IV)

S. HIRANO

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

1. Old peach soil was diluted by virgin soil from 100.5 to 105 times (for example, the soil dilut-ed to 10 times consists of 1 part of peach soil and 9 parts of virgin soil) and peach seedlings were planted in 6-inch pots containing those soils. As the result, the growth in original peach soil was inferior to the control (virgin soil), and the more diluted the soil, the more excellent the growth, and the maximum growth was in 103 times plot. But in the case the soil was more diluted than in this plot, the growth was gradually reduced, and approached to the growth level in virgin soil. 2. On pouring the peach leaf extracts diluted by water from 3 to 1000 times respectively (ori-ginal extract was prepared by immersing the fresh leaves in 10 times water for 24 hours), the peach seedling showed the minimum growth in original extract plot and the maximum in 100 times plot. 3. In sand culture, the ether extract of peach leaves (original extract was prepared by extracting 50g of fresh leaves with ether, and evaporating ether, then dissolving the residue with 50ml of nutrient solution) and its solutions diluted from 10 to 105 times by nutrient solution, were poured on peach seedlings respectively. As a result, the peach growth responses showed the same tendency as in the two tests stated above. The growth in 10 times plot was far inferior to the control (ether extract not supplied) and the growth in 104 and 105 times plot was superior. 4. Generally in these experiments, when peach seedlings were grown in old peach soil or in soil supplied with peach leaf extracts, the seedling growth showed depression, and on the contrary, showed promotion in more diluted plots. It seems that one of its causes is in the presence of some substances which are not nutrient.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach seedling growth in original peach soil was inferior to virgin soil.

Treatment
original peach soile0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
virgin soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth in original peach soil was inferior to the control (virgin soil)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dilution of old peach soil improved seedling growth, with maximum growth at the 103 times plot.

Treatment
more diluted the soile0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
more excellente0
Qualifier
103 times plote0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the more diluted the soil, the more excellent the growth, and the maximum growth was in 103 times plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–444 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further dilution beyond the 103 times plot gradually reduced growth toward virgin-soil growth.

Treatment
soil was more diluted than in this plote0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
gradually reducede0
Comparator
virgin soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil was more diluted than in this plot, the growth was gradually reduced, and approached to the growth level in virgin soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Original peach leaf water extract yielded minimum seedling growth.

Treatment
original extract plote0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the peach seedling showed the minimum growth in original extract plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 100-times diluted peach leaf water extract yielded maximum seedling growth.

Treatment
100 times plote0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the peach seedling showed the minimum growth in original extract plot and the maximum in 100 times plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sand culture, peach leaf ether extract diluted 10 times markedly suppressed growth versus no extract.

Treatment
10 times plote0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
far inferiore0
Comparator
ether extract not suppliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth in 10 times plot was far inferior to the control (ether extract not supplied)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In sand culture, 104- and 105-times diluted peach leaf ether extracts promoted growth versus no extract.

Treatment
104 and 105 times plote0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth in 104 and 105 times plot was superior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest nonnutrient substances as a possible cause of the growth responses.

Outcome
one of its causese0
Qualifier
presence of some substances which are not nutriente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It seems that one of its causes is in the presence of some substances which are not nutrient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1775 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–16 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.