Paper · 1937 · Annals of Applied Biology

THE INFLUENCE OF BORON ON THE SECOND YEAR'S GROWTH OF SUGAR BEET AFFECTED WITH HEART‐ROT

WINIFRED E. BRENCHLEY; D. J. WATSON

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

S ummary Heart‐rot of sugar beet occurred on experimental plots at Rothamsted during 1935, the severity of the attack decreasing steadily with later sowing, but the effects of spacing of the rows and of treatment with sulphate of ammonia were not significant. Where the number of affected plants per row was high, a higher proportion of affected plants showed severe symptoms. Unaffected sugar beets and others showing slight and severe symptoms of heart‐rot were transplanted to sand cultures and treated with light and heavy dressings of boric acid or with none. In the absence of boric acid the characteristic signs of boron deficiency appeared in the shoots, the apices of the stems and the flower buds blackening and dying. This occurred even when no symptoms were present before transplanting. In the presence of boric acid all plants produced healthy shoots, with no deficiency symptoms. Where heart‐rot was originally present and the main axis killed, a number of healthy, lateral shoots were produced. A certain number of plants failed to survive transplanting, the proportion being greatest with the heavy dose of boric acid, with which one‐half of the plants died. This suggests a possible toxic action of the heavy dose which did not come into play if the plants were constitutionally able to withstand the initial poisoning and start away into growth. The later addition of boron did not improve the condition of the roots of affected plants, as irremediable damage had been done before transplanting. The possibility of producing healthy shoots in the second year from affected roots is important from the point of view of seed production, as considerable loss may be saved by the use of small amounts of boron compounds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heart-rot severity decreased with later sowing.

Treatment
later sowinge0
Outcome
severity of the attacke0
Direction
decreasing steadilye0
Setting
Rothamstede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heart‐rot of sugar beet occurred on experimental plots at Rothamsted during 1935, the severity of the attack decreasing steadily with later sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing had no significant effect on heart-rot.

Treatment
spacing of the rowse0
Outcome
effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of spacing of the rows and of treatment with sulphate of ammonia were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–258 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate of ammonia had no significant effect on heart-rot.

Treatment
treatment with sulphate of ammoniae0
Outcome
effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of spacing of the rows and of treatment with sulphate of ammonia were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–258 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rows with more affected plants had a greater proportion showing severe symptoms.

Outcome
proportion of affected plants showed severe symptomse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
number of affected plants per row was highe0
Setting
rowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Where the number of affected plants per row was high, a higher proportion of affected plants showed severe symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without boric acid, boron deficiency signs appeared in shoots even when absent before transplanting.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
absence of boric acide0
Outcome
characteristic signs of boron deficiency appearede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the absence of boric acid the characteristic signs of boron deficiency appeared in the shoots, the apices of the stems and the flower buds blackening and dying. This occurred even when no symptoms were present before transplanting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With boric acid, all plants made healthy shoots without deficiency symptoms.

Treatment
presence of boric acide0
Outcome
healthy shoots, with no deficiency symptomse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the presence of boric acid all plants produced healthy shoots, with no deficiency symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants with heart-rot and a killed main axis produced healthy lateral shoots.

Outcome
a number of healthy, lateral shoots were producede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Where heart‐rot was originally present and the main axis killed, a number of healthy, lateral shoots were produced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The heavy boric acid dose had the greatest transplant mortality, killing half the plants.

Treatment
heavy dose of boric acide0
Outcome
proportione0
Direction
greateste0
Value
one‐halfe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proportion being greatest with the heavy dose of boric acid, with which one‐half of the plants died”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later boron addition did not improve damaged roots.

Treatment
later addition of borone0
Outcome
condition of the rootse0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The later addition of boron did not improve the condition of the roots of affected plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1454 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–64 · show in text ↑

boric acid · nutrient: content · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

boric acid · disease · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.