Paper · 2014 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Growth and nodulation of alfalfa-rhizobia symbiosis under salinity: electrolyte leakage, stomatal conductance, and chlorophyll fluorescence

Lahbib LATRACH; Mohamed FARISSI; Mohammed MAURADI; et al.

6
claims
17
verbatim quotes
67
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present work was a study on the adverse effects of salinity on growth, nodulation, and some physiological parameters in 4 symbiotic combinations involving 2 Moroccan alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations (Demnate and Tata) and 2 rhizobial strains (rhLAr 1 and rhLAr 4). The experiment was conducted in the greenhouse at 32/22 °C day/night, 50%-80% relative humidity, and a photoperiod of 16 h. The seedlings were separately inoculated with suspensions of 2 rhizobial strains and grown under 2 NaCl treatments, 0 mM (control) and 100 mM (salt stress), in plastic pots filled with sterile sand and peat at 9/10 and 1/10 ratios, respectively. The salt stress was applied for 5 weeks and some agro-physiological and biochemical parameters related to salt tolerance were assessed. The results showed that salinity significantly reduced the height of plants, their dry biomass, and nodulation. This constraint has also negatively affected the relative water content of leaves, the membrane permeability, the stomatal conductance, the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, and the chlorophyll contents. Comparison among the symbiotic combinations tested showed that their behavior was significantly different. Plants inoculated with rhizobial strain rhLAr 4 were more tolerant to saline conditions. Their tolerance was associated with the maintaining of adequate levels in terms of physiological and biochemical parameters studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly reduced alfalfa height, dry biomass and nodulation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
100 mM (salt stress)e2
Outcome
height of plants, their dry biomass, and nodulatione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
0 mM (control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that salinity significantly reduced the height of plants, their dry biomass, and nodulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–894 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–198 · show in text ↑
e2

“0 mM (control) and 100 mM (salt stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity negatively affected alfalfa leaf water content, membrane permeability and stomatal conductance.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
100 mM (salt stress)e2
Outcome
relative water content of leaves, the membrane permeability, the stomatal conductancee0
Direction
negatively affectede0
Comparator
0 mM (control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This constraint has also negatively affected the relative water content of leaves, the membrane permeability, the stomatal conductance, the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, and the chlorophyll contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1105 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–198 · show in text ↑
e2

“0 mM (control) and 100 mM (salt stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity negatively affected alfalfa PSII maximum quantum yield and chlorophyll contents.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
100 mM (salt stress)e2
Outcome
maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, and the chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
negatively affectede0
Comparator
0 mM (control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This constraint has also negatively affected the relative water content of leaves, the membrane permeability, the stomatal conductance, the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, and the chlorophyll contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1105 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–198 · show in text ↑
e2

“0 mM (control) and 100 mM (salt stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–556 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested alfalfa–rhizobia combinations behaved significantly differently under salinity.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
behaviore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison among the symbiotic combinations tested showed that their behavior was significantly different.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1212 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa plants inoculated with rhLAr 4 were more salt tolerant.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
inoculated with rhizobial strain rhLAr 4e0
Interactor
rhizobial strain rhLAr 4e0symbiont
Outcome
tolerant to saline conditionse0
Direction
more tolerante0
Comparator
rhLAr 1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants inoculated with rhizobial strain rhLAr 4 were more tolerant to saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1301 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–198 · show in text ↑
e2

“rhLAr 1 and rhLAr 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–274 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerance of rhLAr 4-inoculated alfalfa was associated with maintained physiological and biochemical levels.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Interactor
rhizobial strain rhLAr 4e2symbiont
Outcome
tolerancee0
Qualifier
maintaining of adequate levels in terms of physiological and biochemical parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Their tolerance was associated with the maintaining of adequate levels in terms of physiological and biochemical parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1434 · show in text ↑
e1

“alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–198 · show in text ↑
e2

“rhizobial strain rhLAr 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1260 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

17 papers: 1 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

salinity · symbiosis · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 3 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · disease · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 22 positive, 14 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

salinity · physiology: gas exchange · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.