Paper · 1975 · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research

Levels of water‐soluble carbohydrate in the pre‐anthesis ear of wheat, and grain set per spikelet

C.T. Dougherty; K.R. Rooney; W.R. Scott; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Low levels of water‐soluble carbohydrates in wheat ears before emergence were associated with poor grain set per spikelet when seeding rates were approximately twice conventional ones. Grain set and grain filling in ‘Arawa’ were better than in ‘Aotea’, and ‘Arawa’ also had higher levels of water‐soluble carbohydrate in the pre‐anthesis ears. There was no obvious relationship between nitrogen fertilisation and water‐soluble carbohydrate content of ears near emergence. Irrigation tended to lower levels of water‐soluble carbohydrate in pre‐anthesis ears of ‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’ and reduce grain set. Reduction in grain set through irrigation was greater in wheat to which nitrogen fertiliser was applied. ‘Karamu’, a semidwarf wheat, set more grains in mid‐ear spikelets when nitrogen was applied, whereas the New Zealand cultivars ‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’ did not.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low pre-emergence ear carbohydrates were associated with poor grain set at about twice conventional seeding rates.

Compound
water‐soluble carbohydratese0
Outcome
grain set per spikelete0
Direction
poore0
Qualifier
when seeding rates were approximately twice conventional onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Low levels of water‐soluble carbohydrates in wheat ears before emergence were associated with poor grain set per spikelet when seeding rates were approximately twice conventional ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arawa had better grain set than Aotea.

Material
‘Arawa’e0
Outcome
Grain sete0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
‘Aotea’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain set and grain filling in ‘Arawa’ were better than in ‘Aotea’, and ‘Arawa’ also had higher levels of water‐soluble carbohydrate in the pre‐anthesis ears.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–352 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arawa had better grain filling than Aotea.

Material
‘Arawa’e0
Outcome
grain fillinge0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
‘Aotea’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain set and grain filling in ‘Arawa’ were better than in ‘Aotea’, and ‘Arawa’ also had higher levels of water‐soluble carbohydrate in the pre‐anthesis ears.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–352 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arawa had higher pre-anthesis ear carbohydrates than Aotea.

Material
‘Arawa’e0
Outcome
levels of water‐soluble carbohydratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
‘Aotea’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain set and grain filling in ‘Arawa’ were better than in ‘Aotea’, and ‘Arawa’ also had higher levels of water‐soluble carbohydrate in the pre‐anthesis ears.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–352 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilisation had no obvious relationship with ear carbohydrate content near emergence.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilisatione0
Outcome
water‐soluble carbohydrate content of earse0
Direction
no obvious relationshipe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was no obvious relationship between nitrogen fertilisation and water‐soluble carbohydrate content of ears near emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation tended to lower pre-anthesis ear carbohydrates in Aotea and Arawa.

Material
‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’e0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
levels of water‐soluble carbohydratee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation tended to lower levels of water‐soluble carbohydrate in pre‐anthesis ears of ‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’ and reduce grain set.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation tended to reduce grain set.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
grain sete0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation tended to lower levels of water‐soluble carbohydrate in pre‐anthesis ears of ‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’ and reduce grain set.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–610 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation reduced grain set more in nitrogen-fertilised wheat.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
grain sete0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
wheat to which nitrogen fertiliser was appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reduction in grain set through irrigation was greater in wheat to which nitrogen fertiliser was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen increased mid-ear grain set in Karamu.

Material
‘Karamu’e0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
grains in mid‐ear spikeletse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Karamu’, a semidwarf wheat, set more grains in mid‐ear spikelets when nitrogen was applied, whereas the New Zealand cultivars ‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’ did not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aotea and Arawa did not show the nitrogen response seen in Karamu.

Material
‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’e0
Treatment
nitrogene0
Outcome
grains in mid‐ear spikeletse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Karamu’, a semidwarf wheat, set more grains in mid‐ear spikelets when nitrogen was applied, whereas the New Zealand cultivars ‘Aotea’ and ‘Arawa’ did not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–871 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.