Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation up to 2 weeks after anthesis increased wheat grain yield.

A claim from Wheat yield as affected by sowing rate, irrigation, and time of white clover introduction · 1973

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation up to 2 weeks after anthesis increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Irrigation up to 2 weeks after anthesise4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat yield as affected by sowing rate, irrigation, and time of white clover introduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–89
e4

“Irrigation up to 2 weeks after anthesis increased grain yield, and continuing irrigation through to harvest gave a further small response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–698

Title

Wheat yield as affected by sowing rate, irrigation, and time of white clover introduction

W. R. Scott; C. T. Dougherty; R. H. M. Langer; et al. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 1973. doi:10.1080/03015521.1973.10427928

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-c9b5bd107e3e821c84c9af9dec8e2a08b57b8cb31fc91b2283d1102739abe5ae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
    Irrigation raised dry season yield from 3 to 4.4 t/ha.

    Irrigation of spring‐sown wheat on Templeton silt loam · 1982 · compared with an average of 3 t/ha

    Same directionCites this paper

  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.