Paper · 1973 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Hormone‐Directed Presoaking on Emergence and Growth of Osmotically Stressed Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seeds

B. L. Darra; S. P. Seth; Harvinder Singh; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
24
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The water potential gradient between a planted seed and the surrounding soil largely controls water absorption by the seed. Salinity of soil water affects this balance, which in turn lowers germination and seedling growth. Overcoming the inhibition of water intake by presoaking and the use of auxins and gibberellins has been shown to be advantageous for certain crops,but studies with wheat are limited. This approach constitutes the objectives of this investigation. The effects of presoaking wheat seeds in 10, 20, 50, and 100 ppm each of GA, IBA, IAA, and NAA at O, 3, 6, and 9 atm osmotic pressure on seedling development were observed. Auxins had little influence on emergence at 0 atm but promoted emergence at 3, 6, and 9 atm. Three‐indole acetic acid (IAA) and α — naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) at 50 ppm produced maximum shoot length, whereas gibberellic acid (GA) and three‐indole‐butyric acid (IBA) gave better results at 100 ppm. Increased concentrations of GA and NAA significantly reduced primary root length, whereas IAA increased root length. All hormones increased proliferation of lateral roots, but auxins produced more lateral roots at all salinity levels. Root/shoot ratio was decreased by NAA and GA. Water absorption was increased by all treatments. IAA and NAA at 50 ppm gave the better results. The data support the hypothesis that the beneficial effects of hormones may be the result of increased water absorption, which improves plant growth even under high salt concentrations in the growth medium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxins had little influence on wheat emergence at 0 atm osmotic pressure.

Treatment
Auxinse0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
little influencee0
Qualifier
0 atme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Auxins had little influence on emergence at 0 atm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxins promoted wheat emergence at 3, 6, and 9 atm osmotic pressure.

Treatment
Auxinse0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
promotede0
Qualifier
3, 6, and 9 atme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Auxins had little influence on emergence at 0 atm but promoted emergence at 3, 6, and 9 atm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA at 50 ppm produced maximum wheat shoot length.

Treatment
Three‐indole acetic acid (IAA)e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
50 ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three‐indole acetic acid (IAA) and α — naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) at 50 ppm produced maximum shoot length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 50 ppm produced maximum wheat shoot length.

Treatment
α — naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) at 50 ppme0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three‐indole acetic acid (IAA) and α — naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) at 50 ppm produced maximum shoot length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA gave better wheat shoot length results at 100 ppm.

Treatment
gibberellic acid (GA)e0
Outcome
better resultse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
100 ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gibberellic acid (GA) and three‐indole‐butyric acid (IBA) gave better results at 100 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA gave better wheat shoot length results at 100 ppm.

Treatment
three‐indole‐butyric acid (IBA)e0
Outcome
better resultse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
100 ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gibberellic acid (GA) and three‐indole‐butyric acid (IBA) gave better results at 100 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing GA concentrations significantly reduced wheat primary root length.

Treatment
GAe0
Outcome
primary root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased concentrations of GA and NAA significantly reduced primary root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NAA concentrations significantly reduced wheat primary root length.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
primary root lengthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased concentrations of GA and NAA significantly reduced primary root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA increased wheat root length.

Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA increased root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested hormones increased wheat lateral root proliferation.

Treatment
All hormonese0
Outcome
proliferation of lateral rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All hormones increased proliferation of lateral roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Auxins produced more wheat lateral roots at all salinity levels.

Treatment
auxinse0
Outcome
lateral rootse0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
all salinity levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“auxins produced more lateral roots at all salinity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA decreased the wheat root/shoot ratio.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
Root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root/shoot ratio was decreased by NAA and GA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA decreased the wheat root/shoot ratio.

Treatment
GAe0
Outcome
Root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root/shoot ratio was decreased by NAA and GA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased wheat water absorption.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
Water absorptione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water absorption was increased by all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA at 50 ppm gave the better wheat results overall.

Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
better resultse0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
50 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA and NAA at 50 ppm gave the better results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 50 ppm gave the better wheat results overall.

Treatment
NAA at 50 ppme0
Outcome
better resultse0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IAA and NAA at 50 ppm gave the better results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest hormone benefits may result from increased water absorption, improving wheat growth under high salinity.

Treatment
hormonese0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Qualifier
increased water absorptione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the beneficial effects of hormones may be the result of increased water absorption, which improves plant growth even under high salt concentrations in the growth medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑

acetic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

indole-3-acetic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 54 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

class · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.