Paper · 2009 · Journal of Forest Research

Fine-root production in response to nutrient application at three forest plantations in Sabah, Malaysia: higher nitrogen and phosphorus demand by Acacia mangium

Masahiro Inagaki; Yoshiyuki Inagaki; Koichi Kamo; et al.

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
25
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AbstractWe measured fine-root production at Acacia mangium (AM), Swietenia macrophylla (SM), and Araucaria cunninghamii (AC) sites in response to nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) application using the root-ingrowth core method for a period of 5 months in Sabah, Malaysia. Root growth increased significantly using a combined N and P application at the AM site, whereas it did not increase at the SM and AC sites. The number of nodules at the AM site increased significantly following N application and the combined application of N and P. Root production was not significantly enhanced by nutrient application at the SM and AC sites. At the AM site, both P and N were in high demand despite a larger N pool compared with at the SM and AC sites. These results can be explained by the larger nutrient demand by legumes. We conclude that both N and P is limiting for AM plantations under natural conditions and that N fertilization may be more effective than expected, depending on the site conditions.Keywords: Acacia mangiumAraucaria cunninghamiiRoot-ingrowth coreSwietenia macrophyllaTropical plantations AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank Shinji Kaneko for his valuable comments on the draft report. This study was carried out as a part of an international cooperative research project between the Sabah Forestry Department and the Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences and was funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan, "Development of Agroforestry Technology for the Rehabilitation of Tropical Forests."

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen and phosphorus increased root growth at the Acacia site.

Taxon
Acacia mangiumAcacia mangiume1
Treatment
combined N and P applicatione0
Outcome
Root growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
AM sitee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth increased significantly using a combined N and P application at the AM site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–358 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia mangium (AM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen and phosphorus did not increase root growth at the Swietenia site.

Taxon
Swietenia macrophyllaSwietenia macrophyllae1
Treatment
combined N and P applicatione2
Outcome
Root growthe3
Direction
did not increasee0
Setting
SMe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Swietenia macrophylla
Swietenia macrophylla · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas it did not increase at the SM and AC sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Swietenia macrophylla (SM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“combined N and P application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–343 · show in text ↑
e3

“Root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen and phosphorus did not increase root growth at the Araucaria site.

Taxon
Araucaria cunninghamiiAraucaria cunninghamiie1
Treatment
combined N and P applicatione2
Outcome
Root growthe3
Direction
did not increasee0
Setting
ACe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Araucaria cunninghamii
Araucaria cunninghamii · TaxonJuan Carlos López Almansa · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“whereas it did not increase at the SM and AC sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–410 · show in text ↑
e1

“Araucaria cunninghamii (AC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“combined N and P application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–343 · show in text ↑
e3

“Root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased nodule number at the Acacia site.

Taxon
Acacia mangiumAcacia mangiume1
Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of nodules at the AM site increased significantly following N application and the combined application of N and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–536 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia mangium (AM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen and phosphorus significantly increased nodule number at the Acacia site.

Taxon
Acacia mangiumAcacia mangiume1
Treatment
combined application of N and Pe0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of nodules at the AM site increased significantly following N application and the combined application of N and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–536 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia mangium (AM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application did not significantly enhance root production at the Swietenia site.

Taxon
Swietenia macrophyllaSwietenia macrophyllae1
Treatment
nutrient applicatione0
Outcome
Root productione0
Direction
not significantly enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Swietenia macrophylla
Swietenia macrophylla · TaxonJ.M.Garg · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root production was not significantly enhanced by nutrient application at the SM and AC sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–631 · show in text ↑
e1

“Swietenia macrophylla (SM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application did not significantly enhance root production at the Araucaria site.

Taxon
Araucaria cunninghamiiAraucaria cunninghamiie1
Treatment
nutrient applicatione0
Outcome
Root productione0
Direction
not significantly enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Araucaria cunninghamii
Araucaria cunninghamii · TaxonJuan Carlos López Almansa · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root production was not significantly enhanced by nutrient application at the SM and AC sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–631 · show in text ↑
e1

“Araucaria cunninghamii (AC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–124 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acacia showed high demand for both phosphorus and nitrogen despite a larger nitrogen pool.

Taxon
Acacia mangiumAcacia mangiume1
Outcome
both P and N were in high demande0
Comparator
SM and AC sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the AM site, both P and N were in high demand despite a larger N pool compared with at the SM and AC sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–742 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia mangium (AM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–63 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that nitrogen and phosphorus limit Acacia plantations under natural conditions.

Taxon
Acacia mangiumAcacia mangiume1
Outcome
AM plantationse0
Qualifier
both N and P is limitinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both N and P is limiting for AM plantations under natural conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–902 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia mangium (AM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–63 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization may be more effective than expected depending on site conditions.

Taxon
Acacia mangiumAcacia mangiume1
Outcome
N fertilization may be more effective than expectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Acacia mangium
Acacia mangium · TaxonRodrigo Padula · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilization may be more effective than expected, depending on the site conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–997 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acacia mangium (AM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–63 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Swietenia macrophyllaPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Araucaria cunninghamii (hoop pine)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Araucaria cunninghamii (hoop pine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Acacia mangiumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Acacia mangiumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Acacia mangiumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Acacia mangiumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.