Paper · 2001 · Physiologia Plantarum

Correlation of resistance and H2O2 production in Ulmus pumila and Ulmus campestris cell suspension cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma novo‐ulmi

M. A. De Rafael; T. Valle; M. J. Babiano; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The Dutch elm disease (DED) pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi Buissm. elicited the production of H2O2 in cell suspension cultures of the resistant species Ulmus pumila L. This response was not observed in suspensions of the susceptible elm U. campestris Mill. H2O2 production started after a lag time of 30-40 min following inoculation, peaked between 4 and 6 h and lasted up to 24 h. Treatment of the suspensions with exogenously added H2O2 did not cause accumulation of the sesquiterpene phytoalexins mansonones nor of the coumarin scopoletin. Spore germination and growth of O. novo-ulmi were significantly delayed with different amounts of H2O2 (0.1-1 mM). These results suggest that H2O2 production is an inducible defence response which may contribute to DED resistance by delaying the growth of the pathogen at the earliest stages of infection. Whether H2O2 is involved in other elm defence responses to the pathogen is presently unknown, but its production seems to be an independent event from phytoalexin formation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pathogen elicited H2O2 production in resistant Ulmus pumila cell cultures.

Taxon
Ulmus pumilaUlmus pumilae0
Treatment
Ophiostoma novo-ulmie0
Interactor
Ophiostoma novo-ulmiOphiostoma novo-ulmie0pathogen
Outcome
production of H2O2e0
Direction
elicitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ulmus pumila
Ulmus pumila · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Dutch elm disease (DED) pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi Buissm. elicited the production of H2O2 in cell suspension cultures of the resistant species Ulmus pumila L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Susceptible U. campestris cultures did not show that H2O2 response.

Taxon
U. campestrisUlmus glabrae0
Outcome
This responsee0
Direction
not observede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ulmus glabra
Ulmus glabra · TaxonRonnie Nijboer · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This response was not observed in suspensions of the susceptible elm U. campestris Mill.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–255 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 production began 30-40 min after inoculation, peaked at 4-6 h, and persisted to 24 h.

Taxon
Ulmus pumilaUlmus pumilat0
Outcome
H2O2 productione0
Value
30-40 mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ulmus pumila
Ulmus pumila · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H2O2 production started after a lag time of 30-40 min following inoculation, peaked between 4 and 6 h and lasted up to 24 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–380 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ulmus pumila”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Added H2O2 did not accumulate mansonones or scopoletin.

Taxon
Ulmus pumilaUlmus pumilat0
Treatment
exogenously added H2O2e0
Outcome
accumulation of the sesquiterpene phytoalexins mansonones nor of the coumarin scopoletine0
Direction
did not causee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ulmus pumila
Ulmus pumila · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of the suspensions with exogenously added H2O2 did not cause accumulation of the sesquiterpene phytoalexins mansonones nor of the coumarin scopoletin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ulmus pumila”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 significantly delayed fungal spore germination and growth.

Taxon
O. novo-ulmiOphiostoma novo-ulmie0
Treatment
H2O2 (0.1-1 mM)e0
Outcome
Spore germination and growth of O. novo-ulmie0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Spore germination and growth of O. novo-ulmi were significantly delayed with different amounts of H2O2 (0.1-1 mM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–656 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest induced H2O2 production contributes to resistance by delaying early pathogen growth.

Taxon
Ulmus pumilaUlmus pumilat0
Outcome
DED resistancee0
Qualifier
delaying the growth of the pathogen at the earliest stages of infectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ulmus pumila
Ulmus pumila · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H2O2 production is an inducible defence response which may contribute to DED resistance by delaying the growth of the pathogen at the earliest stages of infection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ulmus pumila”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret H2O2 production as independent of phytoalexin formation.

Taxon
Ulmus pumilaUlmus pumilat0
Outcome
phytoalexin formatione0
Qualifier
independent evente0
Comparator
its productione0

Not reportedCompoundOrgan / stageDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ulmus pumila
Ulmus pumila · TaxonBruce Marlin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its production seems to be an independent event from phytoalexin formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Ulmus pumila”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–61 · show in text ↑