Paper · 2004 · Crop Science

Sorghum and Salinity

Godfrey Wafula Netondo; John Collins Onyango; Erwin Beck

13
claims
37
verbatim quotes
416
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Photosynthetic activity decreases when plants are grown under saline conditions leading to reduced growth and productivity. Leaf growth, gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence of two sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] varieties, Serena and Seredo, were measured in response to increasing NaCl concentration. Sorghum plants were grown in sand culture under controlled greenhouse conditions. The NaCl concentrations in complete nutrient solution were 0 (control), 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 m M Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum. Chlorophyll a and b, net CO 2 assimilation, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate decreased significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) with the increase in salinity, and these decreases were similar for the two sorghum varieties. Salt induced decreases for these physiological traits ranged from 75 to 94%. Photochemical efficiency of PSII (F v /F m ) and photochemical quenching coefficient (qP) decreased by about 9 and 10%, respectively, for both varieties, and electron transport rate (ETR) decreased by 20 and 25% for Serena and Seredo. In contrast, non‐photochemical quenching (NPQ) significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) increased by 44 and 50% for Serena and Seredo. The results indicate that salinity affected photosynthesis per unit leaf area indirectly through stomatal closure, and to a smaller extent through direct interference with the photosynthetic apparatus. In addition, salinity decreases whole plant photosynthesis by restricting leaf area expansion. This effect starts from low levels of salinity, in contrast to that of net photosynthesis per unit leaf area, which occurs at higher levels of NaCl concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced sorghum leaf area about 86% in both varieties.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1
Treatment
Salinitye0e1
Outcome
leaf areae0e1
Direction
reducede0e1
Value
about 86%e0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly decreased chlorophyll a and b.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Treatment
increase in salinitye0e1t0
Outcome
Chlorophyll a and be0e1t0
Direction
decreasede0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a and b, net CO 2 assimilation, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate decreased significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) with the increase in salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–752 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly decreased net CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance and transpiration.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Treatment
increase in salinitye0e1t0
Outcome
net CO 2 assimilation, stomatal conductance, and transpiration ratee0e1t0
Direction
decreasede0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a and b, net CO 2 assimilation, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate decreased significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) with the increase in salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–752 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physiological trait decreases ranged from 75 to 94% and were similar in both varieties.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1
Outcome
these physiological traitse0e1
Direction
decreasese0e1
Value
75 to 94%e0e1
Qualifier
similar for the two sorghum varietiese0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these decreases were similar for the two sorghum varieties. Salt induced decreases for these physiological traits ranged from 75 to 94%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–894 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSII photochemical efficiency decreased about 9%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Treatment
Salinitye0e1t0
Outcome
Photochemical efficiency of PSII (F v /F m )e0e1t0
Direction
decreasede0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photochemical efficiency of PSII (F v /F m ) and photochemical quenching coefficient (qP) decreased by about 9 and 10%, respectively, for both varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1047 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photochemical quenching decreased about 10%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Treatment
Salinitye0e1t0
Outcome
photochemical quenching coefficient (qP)e0e1t0
Direction
decreasede0e1t0
Value
10%e0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photochemical efficiency of PSII (F v /F m ) and photochemical quenching coefficient (qP) decreased by about 9 and 10%, respectively, for both varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1047 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport rate decreased 20% in Serena.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Material
Serenae0e1t0
Treatment
Salinitye0e1t0
Outcome
electron transport rate (ETR)e0e1t0
Direction
decreasede0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“electron transport rate (ETR) decreased by 20 and 25% for Serena and Seredo.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport rate decreased 25% in Seredo.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Material
Seredoe0e1t0
Treatment
Salinitye0e1t0
Outcome
electron transport rate (ETR)e0e1t0
Direction
decreasede0e1t0
Value
25%e0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“electron transport rate (ETR) decreased by 20 and 25% for Serena and Seredo.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonphotochemical quenching increased 44% in Serena.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Material
Serenae0e1t0
Treatment
Salinitye0e1t0
Outcome
non‐photochemical quenching (NPQ)e0e1t0
Direction
increasede0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non‐photochemical quenching (NPQ) significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) increased by 44 and 50% for Serena and Seredo.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1249 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonphotochemical quenching increased 50% in Seredo.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Material
Seredoe0e1t0
Treatment
Salinitye0e1t0
Outcome
non‐photochemical quenching (NPQ)e0e1t0
Direction
increasede0e1t0
Value
50%e0e1t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non‐photochemical quenching (NPQ) significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) increased by 44 and 50% for Serena and Seredo.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1249 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity affected photosynthesis mainly through stomatal closure and partly through direct interference with photosynthetic apparatus.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Treatment
salinitye0e1t0
Outcome
photosynthesis per unit leaf areae0e1t0
Qualifier
stomatal closuree0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity affected photosynthesis per unit leaf area indirectly through stomatal closure, and to a smaller extent through direct interference with the photosynthetic apparatus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1451 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced whole-plant photosynthesis by restricting leaf-area expansion.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Treatment
salinitye0e1t0
Outcome
whole plant photosynthesise0e1t0
Qualifier
restricting leaf area expansione0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salinity decreases whole plant photosynthesis by restricting leaf area expansion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1465–1546 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole-plant photosynthetic effects began at lower salinity than per-area photosynthetic effects.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1t0
Outcome
net photosynthesis per unit leaf areae0e1t0
Direction
highere0e1t0
Comparator
low levels of salinitye0e1t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This effect starts from low levels of salinity, in contrast to that of net photosynthesis per unit leaf area, which occurs at higher levels of NaCl concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1547–1709 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity significantly ( P ≤ 0.01) reduced leaf area by about 86% for both varieties of sorghum.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: pigments · SorghumResults differ

18 papers: 0 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

salinity · growth · SorghumResults differ

89 papers: 11 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · SorghumPositive and negative results

25 papers: 1 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.