Abstract
Wheat cDNAs that encode proteins PR-1.1 and PR-1.2 were cloned. Deduced amino acid sequences were homologous to those of pathogen-induced, basic PR-1 proteins from plants. Although expression of PR1.1 and PR1.2 genes was induced upon infection with either compatible or incompatible isolates of the fungal pathogen Erysiphe graminis, these genes did not respond to activators of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), such as salicylic acid (SA), benzothiadiazole (BTH), or isonicotinic acid (INA).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat PR-1.1 and PR-1.2 cDNAs were cloned.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Gene
- PR-1.1 and PR-1.2e0
- Outcome
- cDNAse0
- Value
- PR-1.1 and PR-1.2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat cDNAs that encode proteins PR-1.1 and PR-1.2 were cloned.”
Claim · model-written summary
Deduced PR-1 protein sequences were homologous to pathogen-induced basic PR-1 proteins.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- amino acid sequencese0
- Comparator
- pathogen-induced, basic PR-1 proteins from plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Deduced amino acid sequences were homologous to those of pathogen-induced, basic PR-1 proteins from plants.”
t0“Wheat Genes”
Claim · model-written summary
Compatible Erysiphe graminis infection induced PR1.1 and PR1.2 expression.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- infection with either compatible or incompatible isolates of the fungal pathogen Erysiphe graminise0
- Interactor
- Erysiphe graminis
Blumeria graminise0pathogen - Gene
- PR1.1 and PR1.2e0
- Outcome
- expression of PR1.1 and PR1.2 genese0
- Direction
- inducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“expression of PR1.1 and PR1.2 genes was induced upon infection with either compatible or incompatible isolates of the fungal pathogen Erysiphe graminis”
t0“Wheat Genes”
Claim · model-written summary
PR1.1 and PR1.2 did not respond to salicylic acid.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- salicylic acid (SA)e0
- Gene
- PR1.1 and PR1.2e1
- Outcome
- expression of PR1.1 and PR1.2 genese1
- Direction
- did not responde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“these genes did not respond to activators of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), such as salicylic acid (SA), benzothiadiazole (BTH), or isonicotinic acid (INA)”
e1“expression of PR1.1 and PR1.2 genes”
t0“Wheat Genes”
Claim · model-written summary
PR1.1 and PR1.2 did not respond to benzothiadiazole.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- benzothiadiazole (BTH)e0
- Gene
- PR1.1 and PR1.2e1
- Outcome
- expression of PR1.1 and PR1.2 genese1
- Direction
- did not responde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“these genes did not respond to activators of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), such as salicylic acid (SA), benzothiadiazole (BTH), or isonicotinic acid (INA)”
e1“expression of PR1.1 and PR1.2 genes”
t0“Wheat Genes”
Claim · model-written summary
PR1.1 and PR1.2 did not respond to isonicotinic acid.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- isonicotinic acid (INA)e0
- Gene
- PR1.1 and PR1.2e1
- Outcome
- expression of PR1.1 and PR1.2 genese1
- Direction
- did not responde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“these genes did not respond to activators of systemic acquired resistance (SAR), such as salicylic acid (SA), benzothiadiazole (BTH), or isonicotinic acid (INA)”
e1“expression of PR1.1 and PR1.2 genes”
t0“Wheat Genes”
The same questions in other papers
acibenzolar-S-methyl · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
salicylic acid · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →Blumeria graminis · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →infection · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.