Paper · 2009 · Biological Agriculture & Horticulture

Fruit Bio-thinning by Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) in Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn

Ahmet Esitken; Lutfi Pirlak; Muzaffer Ipek; et al.

20
claims
43
verbatim quotes
14
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT During 2006 and 2007, fruit thinning effects of three plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPB) strains (Bacillus OSU-142, Microbacterium R23 and Bacillus T7) and NAA (10 and 20 ppm) were tested in apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn in terms of fruit setting, yield, fruit weight, fruit firmness, total soluble solid (TSS), titratable acidity and shoot length in the province of Konya, Turkey. Bacterial strains were sprayed at 7, 14 and 21 days after full bloom, and NAA was sprayed at 21 days after full bloom. The results showed that NAA and bacterial treatments decreased fruit setting and number of fruit per tree at various ratios in both cultivars. The lowest fruit setting cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn were obtained from 20 ppm NAA treatment in both years. Among the bacterial treatments R23 (24.1% in 2006 and 39.1% in 2007) in Golden Delicious and R23 (11.6% in 2006) and T7 (17.3% in 2007) in Braeburn gave the lowest fruit setting ratio while fruit setting ratio in Golden Delicious and Braeburn were 36.7 and 46.2% (2006) and 12.8 and 28.2% (2007) in the control, respectively. The highest fruit number was found from the control in both cultivars and years. Fruit yield was significantly decreased in Golden Delicious by NAA treatments but not affected in Braeburn by thinning. The highest yield was found from the control in cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn in both years. However, fruit weight was significantly increased by NAA and bacterial treatments. While the lowest fruit weight was in the control in both cultivars and years, the highest fruit weight was in R23 in Golden Delicious (164.6 g in 2006) and T7 (138.7 g in 2006) and OSU-142 (173.5 g in 2007) treatments in Braeburn. Treatments of R23 and T7 significantly increased fruit firmness in Golden Delicious and Braeburn in both years, respectively compared with the control. NAA and bacterial applications also significantly increased TSS in Braeburn but not Golden Delicious. The results of this study suggest that Bacillus OSU-142, Microbacterium R23 and Bacillus T7 have the potential to be used as fruit thinning agents under organic and sustainable growing conditions on apple.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA decreased apple fruit set and fruit number.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
fruit setting and number of fruit per treee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA and bacterial treatments decreased fruit setting and number of fruit per tree at various ratios in both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatments decreased apple fruit set and fruit number.

Treatment
bacterial treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit setting and number of fruit per treee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA and bacterial treatments decreased fruit setting and number of fruit per tree at various ratios in both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20 ppm NAA gave the lowest fruit setting in both cultivars and years.

Treatment
20 ppm NAA treatmente0
Outcome
fruit settinge0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest fruit setting cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn were obtained from 20 ppm NAA treatment in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R23 gave the lowest Golden Delicious fruit set among bacterial treatments in 2006 and 2007.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
R23e0
Outcome
lowest fruit setting ratioe1
Direction
loweste1
Value
24.1% in 2006 and 39.1% in 2007e0
Comparator
bacterial treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the bacterial treatments R23 (24.1% in 2006 and 39.1% in 2007) in Golden Delicious”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–876 · show in text ↑
e1

“gave the lowest fruit setting ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R23 gave the lowest Braeburn fruit set among bacterial treatments in 2006.

Material
Braeburne0
Treatment
R23e0
Outcome
fruit setting ratioe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
11.6% in 2006e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R23 (11.6% in 2006) and T7 (17.3% in 2007) in Braeburn gave the lowest fruit setting ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 gave the lowest Braeburn fruit set among bacterial treatments in 2007.

Material
Braeburne0
Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
fruit setting ratioe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
17.3% in 2007e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R23 (11.6% in 2006) and T7 (17.3% in 2007) in Braeburn gave the lowest fruit setting ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control trees had the highest fruit number in both cultivars and years.

Outcome
fruit numbere0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fruit number was found from the control in both cultivars and years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA significantly decreased Golden Delicious fruit yield.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
NAA treatmentse0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield was significantly decreased in Golden Delicious by NAA treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning did not affect Braeburn fruit yield.

Material
Braeburne0
Treatment
thinninge0
Outcome
Fruit yielde1
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not affected in Braeburn by thinning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1314 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit yield was significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1234 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control trees had the highest yield in both cultivars in both years.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield was found from the control in cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA significantly increased apple fruit weight.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight was significantly increased by NAA and bacterial treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatments significantly increased apple fruit weight.

Treatment
bacterial treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight was significantly increased by NAA and bacterial treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R23 produced the highest Golden Delicious fruit weight in 2006, 164.6 g.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
R23e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
164.6 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest fruit weight was in R23 in Golden Delicious (164.6 g in 2006)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 produced the highest Braeburn fruit weight in 2006, 138.7 g.

Material
Braeburne0
Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
fruit weighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
138.7 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T7 (138.7 g in 2006) and OSU-142 (173.5 g in 2007) treatments in Braeburn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1726 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest fruit weight was in R23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OSU-142 produced the highest Braeburn fruit weight in 2007, 173.5 g.

Material
Braeburne0
Treatment
OSU-142e0
Outcome
fruit weighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
173.5 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T7 (138.7 g in 2006) and OSU-142 (173.5 g in 2007) treatments in Braeburn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1726 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest fruit weight was in R23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1609 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

R23 significantly increased Golden Delicious fruit firmness against control in both years.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
R23e0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments of R23 and T7 significantly increased fruit firmness in Golden Delicious and Braeburn in both years, respectively compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T7 significantly increased Braeburn fruit firmness against control in both years.

Material
Braeburne0
Treatment
T7e0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments of R23 and T7 significantly increased fruit firmness in Golden Delicious and Braeburn in both years, respectively compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1878 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA significantly increased Braeburn total soluble solids.

Material
Braeburne0
Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA and bacterial applications also significantly increased TSS in Braeburn but not Golden Delicious.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–1980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatments significantly increased Braeburn total soluble solids.

Material
Braeburne0
Treatment
bacterial applicationse0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA and bacterial applications also significantly increased TSS in Braeburn but not Golden Delicious.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–1980 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple cvs. Golden Delicious and Braeburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest the three bacterial strains as apple fruit thinning agents in organic and sustainable production.

Interactor
Bacillus OSU-142e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fruit thinning agents under organic and sustainable growing conditionse0
Qualifier
Microbacterium R23 and Bacillus T7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus OSU-142, Microbacterium R23 and Bacillus T7 have the potential to be used as fruit thinning agents under organic and sustainable growing conditions on apple.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2186 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

65 papers: 50 positive, 15 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

pruning · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 100 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.