Paper · 2012 · Annals of Agricultural Sciences

Comparative efficacy of some bioagents, plant oil and plant aqueous extracts in controlling Meloidogyne incognita on growth and yield of grapevines

A.A. Mervat; Samaa M. Shawky; Ghada S. Shaker

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
19
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The current experiment was conducted to control the root-knot nematode; Meloidogyne incognita infecting Thompson seedless grapevines by using eight treatments as follows: some bioagents (Trichoderma harzianum and Arbascular mycorrhizae), some plant oil extracts (orange oil extract and jojoba oil) and plant aqueous extracts (Origanum majorana and Tagetes erecta) in comparison with oxamyl (24% EC) on grapes infected with root-knot nematode to determine its impact on growth and yield of grapevines during two successive seasons (2009 and 2010) under field conditions. The chosen vines were 10-year-old grown in a sandy soil in a private vineyard located in Alexandria-Cairo road, spaced at 1.75 × 2.75 m and irrigated by drip irrigation system where the cane was pruned and trellised by the Y shape system. Bioagents and plant aqueous extracts were added to the soil under the vines three times/week after bud burst. Results showed that all the treatments had a significant effect in reducing the total population and build up of root-knot nematodes, M. incognita in both soil and rots especially after the 3 months from the time of application. In addition they had increased the physical characteristics of both clusters and berries, vegetative growth parameters, macro nutrient content and yield of Thompson seedless grapevines during two studied seasons (2009 and 2010) under field conditions. Both jojoba oil and orange oil extract were the most effective treatments in reducing total population and rate of build up of M. incognita in both soil and roots up to the harvesting time. They also increased cluster weight, number of clusters, yield per vine as well as enhancing the physical characteristics of berries, TSS % TSS/acidity ratio whereas, acidity was decreased in berry juice and improved vegetative growth parameters and increased the total surface area/vine, wood ripening coefficient, total chlorophyll and percentages of total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of leaves. Data of root growth parameters showed that the extension of fine roots through the vertical direction (root density) expressed as length of the fine roots were significantly higher at (30 cm) depth in the soil profile, the horizontal extension of fine roots was more concentrated at the distance of (50 cm) from the vine trunk. All treatments recorded the highest values of medium roots and large roots in both horizontal and vertical directions as compared with the control but lower than oxamyl treatment. On the other hand, the treatments with bioagents (T. harzianum and A. mycorrhizae) were in the intermediate rank, whereas, treatments of plant aqueous extracts (O. majorana and T. erecta) were the least effective in both seasons. It can be concluded that jojoba oil and orange oil extract were the best safe treatments compared with oxamyl (24% EC) in reducing total population and rate of build up of root-knot nematodes, M. incognita and improving fruiting of vines yield and quality of the berries of Thompson seedless grapevines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly reduced root-knot nematode population and buildup in soil and roots.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
all the treatmentse0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
total population and build up of root-knot nematodes, M. incognitae0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the treatments had a significant effect in reducing the total population and build up of root-knot nematodes, M. incognita in both soil and rots especially after the 3 months from the time of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1147 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments increased cluster and berry traits, vegetative growth, macronutrient content and yield.

Taxon
Thompson seedless grapevinese0
Treatment
theye0
Outcome
physical characteristics of both clusters and berries, vegetative growth parameters, macro nutrient content and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“they had increased the physical characteristics of both clusters and berries, vegetative growth parameters, macro nutrient content and yield of Thompson seedless grapevines during two studied seasons (2009 and 2010) under field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jojoba oil most effectively reduced nematode population and buildup through harvest.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
jojoba oile0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
total population and rate of build up of M. incognitae0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both jojoba oil and orange oil extract were the most effective treatments in reducing total population and rate of build up of M. incognita in both soil and roots up to the harvesting time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orange oil extract most effectively reduced nematode population and buildup through harvest.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
orange oil extracte0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
total population and rate of build up of M. incognitae0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both jojoba oil and orange oil extract were the most effective treatments in reducing total population and rate of build up of M. incognita in both soil and roots up to the harvesting time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil treatments increased cluster weight, cluster number and yield per vine.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
jojoba oile1
Outcome
cluster weight, number of clusters, yield per vinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They also increased cluster weight, number of clusters, yield per vine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both jojoba oil and orange oil extract were the most effective treatments in reducing total population and rate of build up of M. incognita in both soil and roots up to the harvesting time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil treatments improved berry physical characteristics, TSS and TSS/acidity ratio.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
orange oil extracte1
Outcome
physical characteristics of berries, TSS % TSS/acidity ratioe0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as well as enhancing the physical characteristics of berries, TSS % TSS/acidity ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both jojoba oil and orange oil extract were the most effective treatments in reducing total population and rate of build up of M. incognita in both soil and roots up to the harvesting time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil treatments decreased berry juice acidity.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
jojoba oile1
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acidity was decreased in berry juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both jojoba oil and orange oil extract were the most effective treatments in reducing total population and rate of build up of M. incognita in both soil and roots up to the harvesting time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil treatments increased leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium percentages.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
jojoba oile1
Outcome
total chlorophyll and percentages of total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the total surface area/vine, wood ripening coefficient, total chlorophyll and percentages of total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–1993 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both jojoba oil and orange oil extract were the most effective treatments in reducing total population and rate of build up of M. incognita in both soil and roots up to the harvesting time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1589 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fine root length was significantly higher at 30 cm soil depth.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
length of the fine rootse0
Direction
highere0
Setting
(30 cm) depth in the soil profilee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“length of the fine roots were significantly higher at (30 cm) depth in the soil profile”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2211 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fine roots were most concentrated 50 cm horizontally from the trunk.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
horizontal extension of fine rootse0
Direction
more concentratede0
Setting
(50 cm) from the vine trunke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the horizontal extension of fine roots was more concentrated at the distance of (50 cm) from the vine trunk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2213–2321 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments produced more medium and large roots than controls, but fewer than oxamyl.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Treatment
All treatmentse0
Outcome
medium roots and large rootse0
Direction
highest valuese0
Qualifier
lower than oxamyl treatmente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments recorded the highest values of medium roots and large roots in both horizontal and vertical directions as compared with the control but lower than oxamyl treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2322–2501 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioagents ranked intermediate and plant aqueous extracts least effective across seasons.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
intermediate ranke0
Direction
intermediate ranke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with bioagents (T. harzianum and A. mycorrhizae) were in the intermediate rank, whereas, treatments of plant aqueous extracts (O. majorana and T. erecta) were the least effective in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2525–2731 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–147 · show in text ↑

Simmondsia chinensis · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.