Paper · 1972 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

An Explanation for the Difference in Photosynthetic Capabilities of Healthy and Beet Yellows Virus-infected Sugar Beets (Beta vulgaris L.)

A. E. Hall; R. S. Loomis

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
63
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) infected with the Beet Yellows Virus exhibit lower rates of net photosynthesis at light saturation than do healthy plants. These Pn reductions were correlated with increases in leaf resistance to water vapor loss. Theoretical analyses demonstrated that, although the leaf resistance to water vapor loss increases could account for a major part of the net photosynthesis decreases, some other aspect of leaf functioning also was debilitated by infection. Both the levels and the activities of ribulose-1, 5-diP carboxylase were less on a leaf area basis in extracts from infected leaves than from healthy ones. Soluble carbohydrates accumulate in Beet Yellows Virus-infected leaves, but inhibiting translocation in several ways provided no evidence in support of the hypothesis that the accumulation of photosynthates in leaves has a direct, short term, feed-back effect upon the photosynthetic rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beets infected with Beet Yellows Virus had lower net photosynthesis rates at light saturation than healthy plants.

Treatment
infected with the Beet Yellows Viruse0
Interactor
Beet Yellows VirusBeet yellows viruse0pathogen
Outcome
rates of net photosynthesis at light saturatione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
healthy plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) infected with the Beet Yellows Virus exhibit lower rates of net photosynthesis at light saturation than do healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reductions in photosynthesis of sugar beets were correlated with increases in leaf resistance to water vapor loss.

Organ / stage
leafe1
Outcome
leaf resistance to water vapor losse1
Direction
increasese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) infected with the Beet Yellows Virus exhibit lower rates of net photosynthesis at light saturation than do healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
e1

“These Pn reductions were correlated with increases in leaf resistance to water vapor loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–243 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Theoretical analysis suggests that increased leaf resistance to water vapor loss could account for a major part of the net photosynthesis decreases in infected sugar beets.

Outcome
net photosynthesis decreasese2
Qualifier
leaf resistance to water vapor loss increases could account for a major parte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) infected with the Beet Yellows Virus exhibit lower rates of net photosynthesis at light saturation than do healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“Theoretical analyses demonstrated that, although the leaf resistance to water vapor loss increases could account for a major part of the net photosynthesis decreases, some other aspect of leaf functioning also was debilitated by infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–483 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Another aspect of leaf functioning, besides water vapor resistance, was debilitated in infected sugar beets.

Outcome
some other aspect of leaf functioninge2
Direction
debilitatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) infected with the Beet Yellows Virus exhibit lower rates of net photosynthesis at light saturation than do healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“some other aspect of leaf functioning also was debilitated by infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Levels and activities of ribulose-1,5-diP carboxylase per leaf area were lower in infected than in healthy sugar beet leaves.

Treatment
infected leavese3
Gene
ribulose-1, 5-diP carboxylasee3
Outcome
levels and the activitiese3
Direction
lesse3
Comparator
healthy onese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) infected with the Beet Yellows Virus exhibit lower rates of net photosynthesis at light saturation than do healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both the levels and the activities of ribulose-1, 5-diP carboxylase were less on a leaf area basis in extracts from infected leaves than from healthy ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–639 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble carbohydrates accumulate in leaves of sugar beets infected with Beet Yellows Virus.

Interactor
Beet Yellows VirusBeet yellows viruse4pathogen
Outcome
Soluble carbohydratese4
Direction
accumulatee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) infected with the Beet Yellows Virus exhibit lower rates of net photosynthesis at light saturation than do healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soluble carbohydrates accumulate in Beet Yellows Virus-infected leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibiting translocation gave no evidence that photosynthate accumulation has a direct, short-term feed-back effect on the photosynthetic rate.

Treatment
inhibiting translocation in several wayse5
Outcome
feed-back effect upon the photosynthetic ratee5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) infected with the Beet Yellows Virus exhibit lower rates of net photosynthesis at light saturation than do healthy plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
e5

“inhibiting translocation in several ways provided no evidence in support of the hypothesis that the accumulation of photosynthates in leaves has a direct, short term, feed-back effect upon the photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–929 · show in text ↑

infection · Beet yellows virus · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

11 papers: 0 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.