Paper · 1997 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Breaking Uniculm Growth Habit of Spring Cereals at High Latitudes by Crop Management. II. Tillering, Grain yield and Yield Components

J. Peltonen; P. Peltonen‐Sainio

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
35
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Long days at high latitudes inhibit tillering of cereals and hence seeding rates of 500–700 seeds m −2 are commonly used for spring wheat, barley and oats in Finland. Costs could be reduced by using a lower seeding rate in combination with crop management to produce more head‐bearing tillers m −2 . This study was designed to assess possibilities of breaking the uniculm growth habit of spring cereals by (1) lowering the seeding rate from 600 to 300 seeds m −2 and (2) manipulating tiller growth with early mechanical treatments to the crop (rolling, cutting) or chemical applications (foliar urea, CCC and GA). A low seeding rate and early application of foliar CCC at high latitudes, under good moisture conditions prior to heading, promoted 20% more head‐bearing tillers and 6% higher grain yield than standard management practices. However, cultivars differed in their response to CCC. The advantageous effects of CCC at a low seeding rate were attributed to increase, over the controls, in contribution of head‐bearing tillers to grain yield in wheat (cultivar Heta ), but more grains per head in oats (cultivar Veli ). Varietal recommendations for use of low seeding rate in combination with early CCC spraying should be examined further.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low seeding rate with early CCC application produced 20% more head-bearing tillers than standard management.

Treatment
A low seeding rate and early application of foliar CCCe0
Outcome
head‐bearing tillerse0
Direction
moree0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
under good moisture conditions prior to headinge0
Comparator
standard management practicese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A low seeding rate and early application of foliar CCC at high latitudes, under good moisture conditions prior to heading, promoted 20% more head‐bearing tillers and 6% higher grain yield than standard management practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low seeding rate with early CCC application produced 6% higher grain yield than standard management.

Treatment
A low seeding rate and early application of foliar CCCe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
standard management practicese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“A low seeding rate and early application of foliar CCC at high latitudes, under good moisture conditions prior to heading, promoted 20% more head‐bearing tillers and 6% higher grain yield than standard management practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–846 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed in response to CCC.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
response to CCCe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“However, cultivars differed in their response to CCC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wheat cultivar Heta, head-bearing tillers contributed more to grain yield under low seeding rate and CCC.

Material
Hetae0
Treatment
CCC at a low seeding ratee0
Outcome
contribution of head‐bearing tillers to grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The advantageous effects of CCC at a low seeding rate were attributed to increase, over the controls, in contribution of head‐bearing tillers to grain yield in wheat (cultivar Heta )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In oats cultivar Veli, CCC with low seeding rate increased grains per head over controls.

Material
Velie0
Outcome
grains per heade0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but more grains per head in oats (cultivar Veli ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1135 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend further examination of varietal recommendations for low seeding rate with early CCC spraying.

Outcome
Varietal recommendations for use of low seeding rate in combination with early CCC sprayinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Varietal recommendations for use of low seeding rate in combination with early CCC spraying should be examined further.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1255 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.