Paper · 2003 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Effect of Germination on the Carbohydrate Composition of the Dietary Fiber of Peas (Pisum sativum L.)

María A. Martín-Cabrejas; Nuria Ariza; Rosa Esteban; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
94
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of different conditions of pea germination on dietary fiber (DF) composition was studied. Insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) and soluble dietary fiber (SDF) were subjected to acid hydrolysis, and the resultant neutral sugars, uronic acids, and Klason lignin were quantified. Germinated peas exhibited significantly higher contents of total dietary fiber (TDF) than the raw sample, due to the increases of both DF fractions. Under darkness conditions, germination exhibited the highest contents of IDF and SDF. Decreasing IDF/SDF ratios showed that the carbohydrate changes did not take place to the same extent during germination, the SDF fraction being the most affected. The detailed chemical composition of fiber fractions reveals increases of cellulose in the IDF of germinated samples, whereas SDF exhibits a decrease of pectic polysaccharides and also increases of polysaccharides rich in glucose and mannose. The DF results were corroborated by a comparative examination of the cell wall carbohydrate composition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Germinated peas had significantly higher total dietary fiber than raw peas.

Treatment
Germinatede0
Outcome
contents of total dietary fiber (TDF)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
raw samplee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germinated peas exhibited significantly higher contents of total dietary fiber (TDF) than the raw sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both insoluble and soluble fiber fractions increased with germination.

Outcome
both DF fractionse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“due to the increases of both DF fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Darkness during germination produced the highest insoluble and soluble dietary fiber contents.

Treatment
darkness conditionse0
Outcome
contents of IDF and SDFe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under darkness conditions, germination exhibited the highest contents of IDF and SDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–514 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The IDF/SDF ratio fell during germination.

Treatment
germinatione0
Outcome
IDF/SDF ratiose0
Direction
Decreasinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing IDF/SDF ratios showed that the carbohydrate changes did not take place to the same extent during germination, the SDF fraction being the most affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soluble fiber fraction was the most affected by germination.

Outcome
SDF fraction being the most affectede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the SDF fraction being the most affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cellulose increased in insoluble dietary fiber of germinated peas.

Treatment
germinatede0
Outcome
cellulose in the IDFe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increases of cellulose in the IDF of germinated samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pectic polysaccharides decreased in soluble dietary fiber.

Outcome
pectic polysaccharidese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“SDF exhibits a decrease of pectic polysaccharides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose- and mannose-rich polysaccharides increased in soluble dietary fiber.

Outcome
polysaccharides rich in glucose and mannosee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increases of polysaccharides rich in glucose and mannose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–101 · show in text ↑

stage · quality: grain · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.