Paper · 2002 · Plant Production Science

Varietal Differences in the Morphophysiological Response to Atmospheric Humidity in Rice

Gen-ichi Hirai; Toshikatsu Okumura; Kaoru Ashida; et al.

12
claims
26
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

High atmospheric humidity promotes vegetative growth and dry-matter production in japonica rice. In this study, the varietal differences in the response to atmospheric humidity were examined using three japonica varieties (Nipponbare, Kinmaze, Yamadanishiki), one indica variety IR24 and japonica × indica variety (Milyang 23). The indica and japonica × indica varieties are referred to as indica varieties hereafter. The growth of the japonica varieties was greatly promoted by high humidity (90%) and greatly reduced by low humidity (60%), but that of the indica varieties was less sensitive to humidity and the growth was hardly affected by low humidity. We compared the responses of the above varieties to low humidity (water stress) using the plants under high humidity as a control. Under low humidity, as compared to the indica varieties, the japonica varieties had a higher stomatal density, longer stornata and larger stomatal aperture, resulting in a lower water potential in leaf blades and lower water -use efficiency. Under high humidity, the japonica and indica varieties showed a similar transpiration rate (per unit area), stomatal aperture and water-use efficiency, but the japonica varieties had a higher water content than the indica varieties. This may be why the japonica varieties show greatly suppressed growth and dry matter production under low humidity. These differences between the japonica and indica varieties in morphophysiological characters under low humidity might cause the varietal differences in the plant growth and dry matter production in rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High humidity greatly promoted japonica growth.

Material
japonica varietiese0
Treatment
high humidity (90%)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
greatly promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The growth of the japonica varieties was greatly promoted by high humidity (90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low humidity greatly reduced japonica growth.

Material
japonica varietiese0
Treatment
low humidity (60%)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
greatly reducede0
Comparator
high humidity (90%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The growth of the japonica varieties was greatly promoted by high humidity (90%) and greatly reduced by low humidity (60%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indica growth was less sensitive to humidity.

Material
indica varietiese0
Outcome
less sensitive to humiditye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“that of the indica varieties was less sensitive to humidity and the growth was hardly affected by low humidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low humidity hardly affected indica growth.

Material
indica varietiese1
Treatment
low humiditye0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
hardly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“the growth was hardly affected by low humidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“the indica varieties was less sensitive to humidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–605 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low humidity japonica had higher stomatal density than indica.

Material
japonica varietiese0
Outcome
stomatal densitye0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
low humiditye0
Comparator
indica varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under low humidity, as compared to the indica varieties, the japonica varieties had a higher stomatal density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–898 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low humidity japonica had longer stomata than indica.

Material
japonica varietiese0
Outcome
stornatae0
Direction
longere0
Qualifier
low humiditye0
Comparator
indica varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under low humidity, as compared to the indica varieties, the japonica varieties had a higher stomatal density, longer stornata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low humidity japonica had larger stomatal aperture than indica.

Material
japonica varietiese0
Outcome
stomatal aperturee0
Direction
largere0
Qualifier
low humiditye0
Comparator
indica varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under low humidity, as compared to the indica varieties, the japonica varieties had a higher stomatal density, longer stornata and larger stomatal aperture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–944 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low humidity japonica had lower leaf water potential than indica.

Material
japonica varietiese0
Outcome
water potential in leaf bladese0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
low humiditye0
Comparator
indica varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under low humidity, as compared to the indica varieties, the japonica varieties had a higher stomatal density, longer stornata and larger stomatal aperture, resulting in a lower water potential in leaf blades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–997 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low humidity japonica had lower water-use efficiency than indica.

Material
japonica varietiese0
Outcome
water -use efficiencye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
low humiditye0
Comparator
indica varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under low humidity, as compared to the indica varieties, the japonica varieties had a higher stomatal density, longer stornata and larger stomatal aperture, resulting in a lower water potential in leaf blades and lower water -use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–1030 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high humidity, japonica and indica had similar transpiration rate, stomatal aperture and water-use efficiency.

Material
japonicae0
Outcome
transpiration rate (per unit area), stomatal aperture and water-use efficiencye0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
high humiditye0
Comparator
indica varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under high humidity, the japonica and indica varieties showed a similar transpiration rate (per unit area), stomatal aperture and water-use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1181 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high humidity japonica had higher water content than indica.

Material
japonica varietiese0
Outcome
water contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
high humiditye0
Comparator
indica varietiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under high humidity, the japonica and indica varieties showed a similar transpiration rate (per unit area), stomatal aperture and water-use efficiency, but the japonica varieties had a higher water content than the indica varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1263 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest humidity-related water relations may explain japonica growth suppression.

Outcome
greatly suppressed growth and dry matter productione0
Qualifier
higher water contente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“This may be why the japonica varieties show greatly suppressed growth and dry matter production under low humidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1379 · show in text ↑
e1

“the japonica varieties had a higher water content than the indica varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1263 · show in text ↑

humidity · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 5 positive, 9 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.