Paper · 1963 · Annals of Applied Biology

Greenhouse evaluation of chemicals for control of powdery mildews

A. H. M. KIRBY; E. L. FRICK

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Apple rootstocks placed in the settling‐tower 24 hr. before introduction of spores of Podosphaera Zeucotricha developed more lesions than those placed in position immediately before inoculation; a period of 24 hr. in the tower after introduction of spores induced more infections than one of 48 hr. Rootstocks kept at high temperature for a few hours immediately on removal from the tower (24 hr. after inoculation) developed only half as many lesions as those maintained at normal temperatures. This effect declined steadily as the heating was applied on successively later days until the 8th day when such heating had no effect. Plants kept at about 20°C. and a relative humidity not exceeding 70% grew satisfactorily and developed very similar numbers of lesions to those inoculated in the same tower but subsequently incubated in a greenhouse where R.H. reached saturation every night. High humidity therefore is unnecessary for the inoculation and development of apple mildew. The leaves initially produced by rootstocks potted in John Innes No. I compost and watered daily with ammonium nitrate solution, were no more susceptible to powdery mildew than those on similar plants given water only. However, when such rootstocks were grown for several weeks, cut back to a few buds, and allowed to break again, the leaves were larger and more susceptible if ammonium nitrate was given as a 0·005 to 0·015 M solution. The susceptibility of leaves on M. III rootstocks decreased with age by about 50% per leaf‐position down to the fourth and even faster below that position, so that the youngest leaf that is just unrolling is by far the most susceptible.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks placed in the tower 24 hours before spores developed more lesions than those placed immediately before inoculation.

Treatment
24 hr. before introduction of sporese0
Interactor
Podosphaera Zeucotrichae0pathogen
Outcome
lesionse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
immediately before inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apple rootstocks placed in the settling‐tower 24 hr. before introduction of spores of Podosphaera Zeucotricha developed more lesions than those placed in position immediately before inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-four hours in the tower after spores induced more infections than 48 hours.

Treatment
24 hr. in the tower after introduction of sporese0
Interactor
Podosphaera Zeucotrichae0pathogen
Outcome
infectionse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
48 hr.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apple rootstocks placed in the settling‐tower 24 hr. before introduction of spores of Podosphaera Zeucotricha developed more lesions than those placed in position immediately before inoculation; a period of 24 hr. in the tower after introduction of spores induced more infections than one of 48 hr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Immediate high temperature after removal halved lesion numbers versus normal temperature.

Treatment
high temperature for a few hours immediately on removal from the towere0
Outcome
lesionse0
Direction
only half as manye0
Value
half as manye0
Comparator
normal temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rootstocks kept at high temperature for a few hours immediately on removal from the tower (24 hr. after inoculation) developed only half as many lesions as those maintained at normal temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple rootstocks placed in the settling‐tower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The protective effect of heating declined with later application and disappeared by day eight.

Treatment
heatinge0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
declined steadilye0
Value
8th daye0
Comparator
successively later dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This effect declined steadily as the heating was applied on successively later days until the 8th day when such heating had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple rootstocks placed in the settling‐tower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants held at about 20°C and at most 70% relative humidity had lesion counts similar to greenhouse plants.

Treatment
about 20°C. and a relative humidity not exceeding 70%e0
Outcome
numbers of lesionse0
Direction
very similare0
Comparator
greenhouse where R.H. reached saturation every nighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants kept at about 20°C. and a relative humidity not exceeding 70% grew satisfactorily and developed very similar numbers of lesions to those inoculated in the same tower but subsequently incubated in a greenhouse where R.H. reached saturation every night.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–897 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple rootstocks placed in the settling‐tower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial leaves from daily ammonium nitrate treated plants were no more susceptible than water-only controls.

Treatment
ammonium nitrate solutione0
Outcome
susceptible to powdery mildewe0
Direction
no more susceptiblee0
Comparator
water onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaves initially produced by rootstocks potted in John Innes No. I compost and watered daily with ammonium nitrate solution, were no more susceptible to powdery mildew than those on similar plants given water only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple rootstocks placed in the settling‐tower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After prolonged growth and cutting back, ammonium nitrate yielded larger leaves.

Treatment
ammonium nitrate was given as a 0·005 to 0·015 M solutione0
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, when such rootstocks were grown for several weeks, cut back to a few buds, and allowed to break again, the leaves were larger and more susceptible if ammonium nitrate was given as a 0·005 to 0·015 M solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple rootstocks placed in the settling‐tower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–53 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After prolonged growth and cutting back, ammonium nitrate increased leaf mildew susceptibility.

Treatment
ammonium nitrate was given as a 0·005 to 0·015 M solutione0
Outcome
susceptiblee0
Direction
more susceptiblee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, when such rootstocks were grown for several weeks, cut back to a few buds, and allowed to break again, the leaves were larger and more susceptible if ammonium nitrate was given as a 0·005 to 0·015 M solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1426 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple rootstocks placed in the settling‐tower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–53 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. III rootstock leaf susceptibility fell about 50% per leaf position through the fourth position, then faster.

Material
M. III rootstockse0
Outcome
susceptibility of leavese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
about 50% per leaf‐positione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The susceptibility of leaves on M. III rootstocks decreased with age by about 50% per leaf‐position down to the fourth and even faster below that position, so that the youngest leaf that is just unrolling is by far the most susceptible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple rootstocks placed in the settling‐tower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–53 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

humidity · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

heat · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.