Paper · 2011 · Genetika

Phenotypic variability of bread wheat genotypes for nitrogen harvest index

Biljana Gorjanovic; Milka Brdar-Jokanovic; Marija Kraljevic-Balalic

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Nitrogen harvest index (grain nitrogen content over total nitrogen content ratio) is a measure of the efficiency of nitrogen translocation from the vegetative portions of the plant to the grain. It can be recommended as a selection criterion for nitrogen use efficiency improvement. The aim of this study was to investigate nitrogen harvest index in twelve bread wheat genotypes at three nitrogen levels and to classify genotypes according to their phenotypic similarity for the examined trait. The results of factorial ANOVA showed that nitrogen harvest index was influenced mostly by the year ? genotype interaction, year of investigation and genotype; and to the lowest extent by the applied nitrogen rate. Increasing nitrogen doses did not lead to the increased nitrogen harvest index. The calculated nitrogen harvest index values were the highest for wheat growing season 2004/05, and the smallest for the season 2006/07. The highest nitrogen harvest indices were calculated for cultivars Pobeda at the N0 rate and Zlatka at the N100 rate (0.93), and the lowest for cultivar Tamaro at the N0 rate (0.63). Analyzing the constructed dendogram, cultivars Pobeda and Renan at all three levels of nitrogen supply can be singled out as the genotypes with the highest, and cultivar Tamaro as the variety with the lowest harvest index value. The results of this study may be used in developing new high-yielding bread wheat cultivars with improved nitrogen use efficiency. Growing such cultivars would provide the savings in mineral fertilizers and minimize their possible harmful effect on environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Year by genotype interaction, year and genotype influenced nitrogen harvest index most; nitrogen rate contributed least.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
genotypee0
Outcome
nitrogen harvest indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen harvest index was influenced mostly by the year ? genotype interaction, year of investigation and genotype; and to the lowest extent by the applied nitrogen rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen doses did not increase nitrogen harvest index.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Increasing nitrogen dosese0
Outcome
nitrogen harvest indexe0
Direction
did not lead to the increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrogen doses did not lead to the increased nitrogen harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen harvest index was highest in 2004/05 and lowest in 2006/07.

Outcome
nitrogen harvest index valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
wheat growing season 2004/05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen harvest index values were the highest for wheat growing season 2004/05, and the smallest for the season 2006/07”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–925 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pobeda at N0 had a highest nitrogen harvest index of 0.93.

Material
Pobedae0
Outcome
nitrogen harvest indicese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.93e0
Qualifier
N0 ratee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest nitrogen harvest indices were calculated for cultivars Pobeda at the N0 rate and Zlatka at the N100 rate (0.93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1050 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zlatka at N100 had a highest nitrogen harvest index of 0.93.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Zlatkae0
Outcome
nitrogen harvest indicese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.93e0
Qualifier
N100 ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest nitrogen harvest indices were calculated for cultivars Pobeda at the N0 rate and Zlatka at the N100 rate (0.93)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tamaro at N0 had the lowest nitrogen harvest index, 0.63.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Tamaroe0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.63e0
Qualifier
N0 ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest for cultivar Tamaro at the N0 rate (0.63)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across nitrogen levels, Pobeda and Renan ranked highest and Tamaro lowest for harvest index.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Pobedae0
Outcome
harvest index valuee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivars Pobeda and Renan at all three levels of nitrogen supply can be singled out as the genotypes with the highest, and cultivar Tamaro as the variety with the lowest harvest index value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend nitrogen harvest index as a selection criterion for improved nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
selection criterion for nitrogen use efficiency improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It can be recommended as a selection criterion for nitrogen use efficiency improvement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–281 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–37 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.