Paper · 1996 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Use of velvet bean to improve soil fertility and weed control in corn production in northern belize

C. L. Coultas; T. J. Post; J. B. Jones; et al.

20
claims
34
verbatim quotes
10
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this research was to mesasure the effect of intercropping corn (Zea mays L.) with velvet bean (Mucuna pruriens) oil corn yields, soil fertility, and weed control in northern Belize. Two soils were used which are widespread in the area. These soils are high in clay (simectitc) and are well supplied with bases. One soil, the Louisville, has a black surface horizon overlying light gray to white calcareous weathered coral. The other soil was Xaibe which consists of a reddish‐brown clay over hard limestone “cap rock”; at 30–40 cm. Both soils had a relatively high organic carbon (C) and total nitrogen (N) content. We classified the Louisville as Calciustert and the Xaibe as a Ustropept. The treatments used (carried out annually in 1990, 1991, and 1992) were residue burn (B), bum plus fertilizer (BF), a velvet bean intercrop (G), and a velvet bean intercrop plus fertilizer (GF). Velvet bean intercropping did not have a positive effect on corn yields on these soils. For adequate yields to be maintained, it appears that fertilization with N, phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and certain micronutrients are required. We did obtain some indication that velvet bean intercropping will reduce weed population, including a serious infestation of cogongrass (Jmperata cylindrica). Velvet bean did not maintain the soil N content Corn yields decreased on the Louisville soil at San Victor from a range of 2,804 kg/ha to 3,181 kg/ha in 1990 to 1,783 kg/ha to 2,065 kg/ha in 1992. There were no significant treatment effects in any year. With the Xaibe soil, no yields were obtained in 1990 because of weed competition. In 1991, yields ranged from 555 kg/ha to 1,146 kg/ha (no significant treatment effects). In 1992, the fertilized plots, BF and GF, had corn yields of 1,391 kg/ha and 1,592 kg/ha, respectively. The unfertilized plots, B and G, had corn yields of 751 kg/ha and 699 kg/ha, respectively. We did obtain sufficient information valuable for persons making fertilizer recommendations on similar types of soil. The Mehlich 3 and the ammonium bicarbonate‐DTPA extractant (the latter extractant similar to that used in Belize) did not give good correlations between P and K leaf levels and corn yields. Where soil test P and K were often adequate, corn ear leaf levels were deficient (and presumably yields were reduced because of this metabolic deficiency). We concluded from both soil tests and leaf analyses that the micronutrients copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and molybdenum (Mo) are seldom, if ever, limiting plant growth and grain yield, although there appears to be seasonal differences. With both soils, soil tests were not good indicators of zinc (Zn) concentrations in the leaf. In 1992, soil tests indicated adequacy of this element, although leaf Zn was deficient in all plots on the Louisville soil in 1990, most plots in 1992, and several plots on the Xaibe soil in both years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both soils had relatively high organic carbon and total nitrogen.

Outcome
organic carbon (C) and total nitrogen (N) contente0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both soils had a relatively high organic carbon (C) and total nitrogen (N) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvet bean intercropping did not improve corn yield.

Treatment
Velvet bean intercroppinge0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
did not have a positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Velvet bean intercropping did not have a positive effect on corn yields on these soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–997 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvet bean intercropping showed some evidence of reducing weeds, including cogongrass.

Treatment
velvet bean intercroppinge0
Interactor
cogongrasse0
Outcome
weed populatione0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“velvet bean intercropping will reduce weed population, including a serious infestation of cogongrass (Jmperata cylindrica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Velvet bean did not maintain soil nitrogen content.

Treatment
Velvet beane0
Outcome
soil N contente0
Direction
did not maintaine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Velvet bean did not maintain the soil N content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1352 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Louisville corn yield fell from 1990 to 1992.

Outcome
Corn yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
1,783 kg/ha to 2,065 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2,804 kg/ha to 3,181 kg/ha in 1990e0
Setting
Louisville soil at San Victore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields decreased on the Louisville soil at San Victor from a range of 2,804 kg/ha to 3,181 kg/ha in 1990 to 1,783 kg/ha to 2,065 kg/ha in 1992”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments had no significant effects in any year on Louisville soil.

Outcome
treatment effectse0
Direction
no significante0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant treatment effects in any year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1557 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xaibe produced no yield in 1990 because of weed competition.

Interactor
weede0
Outcome
no yieldse0
Qualifier
weed competitione0
Setting
Xaibe soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the Xaibe soil, no yields were obtained in 1990 because of weed competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1639 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Xaibe yields in 1991 ranged from 555 to 1,146 kg/ha with no significant treatment effect.

Outcome
yieldse0
Value
555 kg/ha to 1,146 kg/hae0
Qualifier
no significant treatment effectse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1991, yields ranged from 555 kg/ha to 1,146 kg/ha (no significant treatment effects)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1728 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1992, fertilized BF plots yielded 1,391 kg/ha.

Material
BFe0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Value
1,391 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fertilized plots, BF and GF, had corn yields of 1,391 kg/ha and 1,592 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1832 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1992, fertilized GF plots yielded 1,592 kg/ha.

Material
GFe0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Value
1,592 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fertilized plots, BF and GF, had corn yields of 1,391 kg/ha and 1,592 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1832 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1992, unfertilized B plots yielded 751 kg/ha.

Material
Be0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Value
751 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The unfertilized plots, B and G, had corn yields of 751 kg/ha and 699 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1992, unfertilized G plots yielded 699 kg/ha.

Material
Ge0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Value
699 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The unfertilized plots, B and G, had corn yields of 751 kg/ha and 699 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–1923 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mehlich 3 and ammonium bicarbonate-DTPA tests correlated poorly with leaf P and K and yield.

Outcome
correlations between P and K leaf levels and corn yieldse0
Qualifier
did not give good correlationse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Mehlich 3 and the ammonium bicarbonate‐DTPA extractant (the latter extractant similar to that used in Belize) did not give good correlations between P and K leaf levels and corn yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2043–2231 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil test P and K were often adequate while ear-leaf levels were deficient.

Organ / stage
ear leafe0
Outcome
corn ear leaf levelse0
Direction
deficiente0
Comparator
soil test P and Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Where soil test P and K were often adequate, corn ear leaf levels were deficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2233–2313 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred leaf nutrient deficiency may have reduced yields.

Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
metabolic deficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“presumably yields were reduced because of this metabolic deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2319–2386 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu, Mn, and Mo were seldom limiting for growth and grain yield.

Outcome
plant growth and grain yielde0
Direction
seldom, if ever, limitinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the micronutrients copper (Cu), manganese (Mn), and molybdenum (Mo) are seldom, if ever, limiting plant growth and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2446–2572 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil tests poorly indicated leaf Zn on both soils.

Outcome
zinc (Zn) concentrations in the leafe0
Qualifier
not good indicatorse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With both soils, soil tests were not good indicators of zinc (Zn) concentrations in the leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2625–2717 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Zn was deficient in all Louisville plots in 1990.

Outcome
leaf Zne0
Direction
deficiente0
Qualifier
all plotse0
Setting
Louisville soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf Zn was deficient in all plots on the Louisville soil in 1990”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2784–2849 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Zn was deficient in most Louisville plots in 1992.

Outcome
leaf Zne0
Direction
deficiente0
Qualifier
most plots in 1992e0
Setting
Louisville soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf Zn was deficient in all plots on the Louisville soil in 1990, most plots in 1992”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2784–2869 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf Zn was deficient in several Xaibe plots in both years.

Outcome
leaf Zne1
Qualifier
several plotse0
Setting
Xaibe soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“several plots on the Xaibe soil in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2875–2920 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf Zn was deficient in all plots on the Louisville soil in 1990, most plots in 1992, and several plots on the Xaibe soil in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2784–2920 · show in text ↑

Mucuna pruriens var. utilis · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Mucuna pruriens var. utilis · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Mucuna pruriens var. utilis · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

220 papers in the same direction as this paper · 613 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.