Paper · 2014 · Plant Production Science

Comparison of Five Nitrogen Dressing Methods to Optimize Rice Growth

Qingchun Chen; Yongchao Tian; Xia Yao; et al.

12
claims
34
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The applicability of five nitrogen (N) dressing methods to rice cultivation was examined using the canopy spectrum-based nitrogen optimization algorithm (CSNOA), leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA). After base-tiller N dressing (basal dressing and top dressing at the tillering stage) at low and normal levels, rice plants were grown by the above five N dressing methods. The effects of different N dressing methods on plant dry weight, plant N accumulation, grain yield, N use efficiency, and economic benefit were analyzed. Compared with the standard method, under the low base-tiller N dressing level, the optimum N dressing rate was decreased, and the economic benefit was increased by adapting the N dressing methods of CSNOA and SSNM, whereas the optimum N dressing rate was increased, and the economic benefit was decreased by the other three N dressing methods. Under the general base-tiller N dressing level, the optimum N rate, N-use efficiency and economic benefit were increased by all N dressing methods except the NFOA. These results indicated that the CSNOA and SSNM were two good techniques for quantifying N dressing in rice, with higher economic benefit, less N input, and better applicability under different base-tiller N dressing levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low base-tiller nitrogen, CSNOA reduced the optimum dressing rate relative to the standard method.

Treatment
CSNOAe0
Outcome
optimum N dressing ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
low base-tiller N dressing levele0
Comparator
standard methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the standard method, under the low base-tiller N dressing level, the optimum N dressing rate was decreased, and the economic benefit was increased by adapting the N dressing methods of CSNOA and SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low base-tiller nitrogen, SSNM reduced the optimum dressing rate relative to the standard method.

Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
optimum N dressing ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
low base-tiller N dressing levele0
Comparator
standard methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the standard method, under the low base-tiller N dressing level, the optimum N dressing rate was decreased, and the economic benefit was increased by adapting the N dressing methods of CSNOA and SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low base-tiller nitrogen, CSNOA increased economic benefit relative to the standard method.

Treatment
CSNOAe0
Outcome
economic benefite0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
standard methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the standard method, under the low base-tiller N dressing level, the optimum N dressing rate was decreased, and the economic benefit was increased by adapting the N dressing methods of CSNOA and SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low base-tiller nitrogen, SSNM increased economic benefit relative to the standard method.

Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
economic benefite0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
standard methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the standard method, under the low base-tiller N dressing level, the optimum N dressing rate was decreased, and the economic benefit was increased by adapting the N dressing methods of CSNOA and SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low base-tiller nitrogen, LAI increased optimum dressing rate and decreased economic benefit.

Treatment
LAIe1
Outcome
optimum N dressing ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum N dressing rate was increased, and the economic benefit was decreased by the other three N dressing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low base-tiller nitrogen, NNI increased optimum dressing rate.

Treatment
NNIe1
Outcome
optimum N dressing ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum N dressing rate was increased, and the economic benefit was decreased by the other three N dressing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low base-tiller nitrogen, NFOA increased optimum dressing rate.

Treatment
NFOAe1
Outcome
optimum N dressing ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum N dressing rate was increased, and the economic benefit was decreased by the other three N dressing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low base-tiller nitrogen, LAI decreased economic benefit.

Treatment
LAIe1
Outcome
economic benefite0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum N dressing rate was increased, and the economic benefit was decreased by the other three N dressing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low base-tiller nitrogen, NNI decreased economic benefit.

Treatment
NNIe1
Outcome
economic benefite0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum N dressing rate was increased, and the economic benefit was decreased by the other three N dressing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low base-tiller nitrogen, NFOA decreased economic benefit.

Treatment
NFOAe1
Outcome
economic benefite0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum N dressing rate was increased, and the economic benefit was decreased by the other three N dressing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At general base-tiller nitrogen, methods other than NFOA increased optimum nitrogen rate, nitrogen use efficiency and economic benefit.

Treatment
all N dressing methods except the NFOAe0
Outcome
optimum N rate, N-use efficiency and economic benefite0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
general base-tiller N dressing levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the general base-tiller N dressing level, the optimum N rate, N-use efficiency and economic benefit were increased by all N dressing methods except the NFOA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area index (LAI), site-specific N management (SSNM), N nutrition index (NNI), and N fertilizer optimization algorithm (NFOA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–291 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify CSNOA and SSNM as applicable techniques for rice nitrogen dressing across base-tiller levels.

Outcome
good techniques for quantifying N dressinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CSNOA and SSNM were two good techniques for quantifying N dressing in rice, with higher economic benefit, less N input, and better applicability under different base-tiller N dressing levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1351 · show in text ↑

climate site · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

172 papers: 110 positive, 62 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

168 papers more in this group

See all 172 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.