Paper · 2001 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effects of controlled release fertilizer on rice yield and N recovery

Fu Jian

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at Tsuruoka City, Yamagata Prefecture, Japan in 1998 15 N trace method was used to test the effects of polyolefin coated urea (controlled release fertilizer) as basal on rice yield, the pattern of N absorption and N recovery rate compared with urea and ammonium sulfate with split application Results indicated that: 1) For transplanting rice, the highest yield was obtained by the blend of urea and LPS 100 in the ratio of 1:1 as basal, and increased by 23 6% and 9 2% compared with urea and ammonium sulfate, respectively For the direct seeding rice the highest yield was obtained by LP 100 as basal, and increased by 9 2% and 4 0% compared with urea and ammonium sulfate, respectively Controlled release fertilizer treatments could give more effective panicles and filled grains of rice than urea and ammonium sulfate treatments 2) No significant difference was observed in total N uptake among fertilizer treatments But the N accumulation from transplanting (or seeding) to panicle initiation in plants treated with controlled fertilizer were much more than conventional fertilization, resulting in the greater number of panicles per unit area and filled grains per panicle 3) 15 N labeled experiment indicated that up to maximum tiller stage N absorption of rice from basal fertilizer of urea and ammonium sulfate accounted for 33%~45% of total N absorption from basal fertilizer only N uptake from basal fertilizer lasted to heading stage in urea or ammonium sulfate plots and to harvesting stage in LP 100 plot While N uptake from topdressing applied at panicle initiation stage completed on 45 days after application 4) The total N recovery rate tested using 15 N method was higher in urea plot than ammonium sulfate and LP 100, while that tested using difference method was higher in the LP 100 than other treatments The N recovery rate of basal fertilizer was in the order of LP 100ammonium sulfate urea Basal application of urea/LPS 100 blend and LP 100 had higher physiological and agronomic efficiency of N than urea and ammonium sulfate, that may be the main reason for getting high yield by controlled fertilizer in the trail

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A urea and LPS 100 blend gave the highest transplanted rice yield, exceeding urea and ammonium sulfate by 23 6% and 9 2%.

Treatment
blend of urea and LPS 100 in the ratio of 1:1 as basale0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23 6% and 9 2%e0
Comparator
urea and ammonium sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For transplanting rice, the highest yield was obtained by the blend of urea and LPS 100 in the ratio of 1:1 as basal, and increased by 23 6% and 9 2% compared with urea and ammonium sulfate, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LP 100 basal fertilizer gave the highest direct-seeded rice yield, 9 2% and 4 0% above urea and ammonium sulfate.

Treatment
LP 100 as basale0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9 2% and 4 0%e0
Comparator
urea and ammonium sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the direct seeding rice the highest yield was obtained by LP 100 as basal, and increased by 9 2% and 4 0% compared with urea and ammonium sulfate, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled release fertilizers produced more effective panicles and filled grains.

Treatment
Controlled release fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
effective panicles and filled grainse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
urea and ammonium sulfate treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Controlled release fertilizer treatments could give more effective panicles and filled grains of rice than urea and ammonium sulfate treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen uptake did not differ significantly among fertilizer treatments.

Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
No significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant difference was observed in total N uptake among fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–950 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled fertilizer increased nitrogen accumulation before panicle initiation relative to conventional fertilization.

Treatment
controlled fertilizere0
Outcome
N accumulatione0
Direction
much moree0
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the N accumulation from transplanting (or seeding) to panicle initiation in plants treated with controlled fertilizer were much more than conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal nitrogen uptake lasted until harvest with LP 100, versus heading with urea or ammonium sulfate.

Treatment
LP 100e0
Outcome
N uptake from basal fertilizere0
Qualifier
harvesting stagee0
Comparator
urea or ammonium sulfatee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake from basal fertilizer lasted to heading stage in urea or ammonium sulfate plots and to harvesting stage in LP 100 plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1548 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15 N method ranked urea highest for total nitrogen recovery.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
total N recovery ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ammonium sulfate and LP 100e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“The total N recovery rate tested using 15 N method was higher in urea plot than ammonium sulfate and LP 100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The difference method ranked LP 100 highest for total nitrogen recovery.

Treatment
LP 100e0
Outcome
total N recovery ratee1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“that tested using difference method was higher in the LP 100 than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1856 · show in text ↑
e1

“The total N recovery rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal urea/LPS 100 blend and LP 100 had higher physiological and agronomic nitrogen efficiency than conventional fertilizers.

Treatment
urea/LPS 100 blend and LP 100e0
Outcome
physiological and agronomic efficiency of Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
urea and ammonium sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“Basal application of urea/LPS 100 blend and LP 100 had higher physiological and agronomic efficiency of N than urea and ammonium sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1945–2081 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.