Paper · 1977 · Annals of Applied Biology

The involvement of fungi in the breakdown of sulphited strawberries

C. Dennis

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Between 8000 and 9000 tons of strawberries are used annually for jam manufacture in the UK, c. 65 % of which are stored in sulphite liquor (6 % SO 2 +lime, c. pH 3.0). Sporadic cases of disintegration of sulphited strawberries have been observed increasingly in recent years. In laboratory experiments breakdown of whole berries in sulphite liquor was achieved by including berries partly rotted with Mucor mucedo, Rhizopus sexualis or R. stolonifer , 1.5‐2.5 % infected material causing complete breakdown of all of the berries. The inclusion of up to 25 % berries infected with Botrytis cinerea caused no softening of the berries. The addition of culture filtrates to whole fruit in sulphite liquor confirmed observations with the above fungi but also showed that pectolytic enzymes from Aureobasidium pullulans and Trichosporon pullulans could cause breakdown. The incidence of spoilage fungi on commercially harvested fruit indicated that M. mucedo and R. sexualis were the main cause of breakdown, but that A. pullulans increased tenfold on fruit stored at 15 °C overnight before sulphiting. Results from commercially harvested fruit (cv. Cambridge Favourite) in 1975 and 1976 showed that: (I) fruit should be sulphited as soon as possible after harvest, since the storage of harvested fruit prior to sulphiting may give a poorer quality product; (2) there is little difference in breakdown of fruit from plants treated with the pre‐harvest fungicides, Elvaron, Mildothane, or Daconil, and (3) fruit grown in different areas of the UK shows varying amounts of breakdown. This may be due to differences in the infection level of Phycomycetes and contamination by other pectolytic fungi or inherent differences in the susceptibility of the fruit to enzyme attack.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mucor mucedo-infected berries caused complete breakdown at 1.5–2.5% inclusion.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
berries partly rotted with Mucor mucedoe0
Interactor
Mucor mucedoMucor mucedoe0pathogen
Outcome
complete breakdown of all of the berriese0
Value
1.5‐2.5 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mucor mucedo
Mucor mucedo · InteractorJames Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“berries partly rotted with Mucor mucedo, Rhizopus sexualis or R. stolonifer , 1.5‐2.5 % infected material causing complete breakdown of all of the berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizopus sexualis-infected berries caused complete breakdown at 1.5–2.5% inclusion.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Rhizopus sexualise0
Interactor
Rhizopus sexualisRhizopus sexualise0pathogen
Outcome
complete breakdown of all of the berriese0
Value
1.5‐2.5 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizopus sexualis or R. stolonifer , 1.5‐2.5 % infected material causing complete breakdown of all of the berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. stolonifer-infected berries caused complete breakdown at 1.5–2.5% inclusion.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
R. stolonifere0
Interactor
R. stoloniferRhizopus stolonifere0pathogen
Outcome
complete breakdown of all of the berriese0
Value
1.5‐2.5 %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus stolonifer
Rhizopus stolonifer · InteractorW.A. Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R. stolonifer , 1.5‐2.5 % infected material causing complete breakdown of all of the berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 445–537 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Up to 25% Botrytis-infected berries caused no softening.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
berries infected with Botrytis cinereae0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
softening of the berriese0
Direction
no softeninge0
Qualifier
up to 25 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“up to 25 % berries infected with Botrytis cinerea caused no softening of the berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aureobasidium pullulans filtrates caused fruit breakdown.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
pectolytic enzymes from Aureobasidium pullulanse0
Interactor
Aureobasidium pullulansAureobasidium pullulanse0pathogen
Outcome
breakdowne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aureobasidium pullulans
Aureobasidium pullulans · InteractorThis image was created by user Tom Volk (TomVolk) at Mushroom Observer , a source for mycological images. You can contact this user here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pectolytic enzymes from Aureobasidium pullulans and Trichosporon pullulans could cause breakdown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichosporon pullulans filtrates caused fruit breakdown.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Trichosporon pullulanse0
Interactor
Trichosporon pullulansTausonia pullulanse0pathogen
Outcome
breakdowne0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pectolytic enzymes from Aureobasidium pullulans and Trichosporon pullulans could cause breakdown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. mucedo and R. sexualis were the main breakdown causes on harvested fruit.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Interactor
M. mucedoMucor mucedoe0pathogen
Second interactor
R. sexualisRhizopus sexualise0pathogen
Outcome
main cause of breakdowne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mucor mucedo
Mucor mucedo · InteractorJames Lindsey · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. mucedo and R. sexualis were the main cause of breakdown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. pullulans increased tenfold after overnight storage at 15 °C.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Interactor
A. pullulansAureobasidium pullulanse0pathogen
Outcome
A. pullulanse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
tenfolde0
Qualifier
stored at 15 °C overnight before sulphitinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aureobasidium pullulans
Aureobasidium pullulans · InteractorThis image was created by user Tom Volk (TomVolk) at Mushroom Observer , a source for mycological images. You can contact this user here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. pullulans increased tenfold on fruit stored at 15 °C overnight before sulphiting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sulphiting fruit promptly after harvest.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
sulphited as soon as possible after harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit should be sulphited as soon as possible after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest fungicides showed little difference in fruit breakdown.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
pre‐harvest fungicidese0
Outcome
breakdown of fruite0
Direction
little differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is little difference in breakdown of fruit from plants treated with the pre‐harvest fungicides, Elvaron, Mildothane, or Daconil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit breakdown varied among UK growing areas.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
amounts of breakdowne0
Direction
varyinge0
Setting
UKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit grown in different areas of the UK shows varying amounts of breakdown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1583 · show in text ↑
t0

“strawberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑

Botrytis cinerea · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

infection · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.