Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Strawberries treated with enzyme solution from irradiated B. cinerea were harder than controls.

A claim from Effect of Electron Beam Irradiation on Pathogenicity and Pathogenic Enzyme Activity of Botrytis cinerea · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberries treated with enzyme solution from irradiated B. cinerea were harder than controls.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
enzyme solution which producted by B.cinerea irradiated by electron beam at 2.0kGye0
Interactor
B.cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
hardnesse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control strawberrye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The hardness of strawberry treated by enzyme solution which producted by B.cinerea irradiated by electron beam at 2.0kGy was higher than that of control strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1156

Title

Effect of Electron Beam Irradiation on Pathogenicity and Pathogenic Enzyme Activity of Botrytis cinerea

Yongjin Qiao Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences 2013

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-9a4cdfe5a2cb868d398d8a8614ec1f5adefc9bcfa5e3a1cdadd91dfcf1f91364 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

Botrytis cinerea · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

radiation · quality: postharvest · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.