Paper · 2010 · Crop and Pasture Science

The risk of vegetative water deficit in early-sown faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and its implications for crop productivity in a Mediterranean-type environment

R. J. French

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Farmers in Mediterranean-type environments should plant annual crops as early as possible to maximise yield. Greater rainfall variability at the start of the growing season potentially exposes early-sown crops to water deficit, which may be severe enough to cause crop mortality or to reduce potential productivity. This paper shows that in a typical Mediterranean-type environment at Merredin, Western Australia, much longer dry periods between rainfall events are likely in April rather than in May or June, but with a sowing rule based on farmer behaviour the likelihood of damaging water deficit is small. Soil water at sowing is a good indicator of this likelihood. The implications of early water deficit for crop productivity were investigated for faba bean in two experiments at Merredin in 1997 and 1998. In 1997 simulated plant available water in the top 40 cm (PAW40) at sowing was 24 mm and 8-week-old plants displayed severe wilting after 6 weeks without rain. There was no crop mortality even after 8 weeks without rain and plants recovered quickly when rewatered. Water deficit reduced grain yield through lower evapotranspiration since withholding water reduced total supply but also because severely stressed plants could not extract water from as deep in the soil as less stressed plants. In 1998 simulated PAW40 at sowing was 41 mm and no wilting was observed when water was withheld for 8 weeks. Apparent transpiration efficiency was not affected by mild water deficit in either year, but was reduced by 35% by delaying sowing in 1998. This was due to higher atmospheric vapour pressure deficit during reproductive growth of the later-sown crop. These results suggest that delaying sowing in faba bean is more likely to reduce faba bean grain yield unless there is a strong likelihood of severe water deficit soon after sowing. This likelihood can be judged from the amount of soil water at sowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Long dry periods at Merredin were more likely in April than May or June.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
dry periods between rainfall eventse0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
May or Junee0
Setting
Merredin, Western Australiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Merredin, Western Australia, much longer dry periods between rainfall events are likely in April rather than in May or June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Under the farmer-based sowing rule, damaging water deficit was unlikely.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
likelihood of damaging water deficite0
Direction
smalle0
Qualifier
sowing rule based on farmer behavioure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with a sowing rule based on farmer behaviour the likelihood of damaging water deficit is small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil water at sowing was a good indicator of damaging deficit likelihood.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
likelihood of damaging water deficite1
Setting
Soil water at sowinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil water at sowing is a good indicator of this likelihood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–669 · show in text ↑
e1

“likelihood of damaging water deficit is small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1997, eight-week-old plants wilted severely after six weeks without rain at 24 mm simulated PAW40.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
8-week-old plantse0
Outcome
severe wiltinge0
Value
24 mme0
Qualifier
after 6 weeks without raine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1997 simulated plant available water in the top 40 cm (PAW40) at sowing was 24 mm and 8-week-old plants displayed severe wilting after 6 weeks without rain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No faba bean mortality occurred after eight rainless weeks, and plants recovered rapidly on rewatering.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
no crop mortalitye0
Qualifier
after 8 weeks without raine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no crop mortality even after 8 weeks without rain and plants recovered quickly when rewatered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faba bean plants recovered quickly after rewatering.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
rewaterede0
Outcome
recovered quicklye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants recovered quickly when rewatered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1077 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced faba bean grain yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit reduced grain yield through lower evapotranspiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed reduced grain yield partly to lower evapotranspiration under water deficit.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Water deficite0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
lower evapotranspiratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit reduced grain yield through lower evapotranspiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severely stressed plants extracted water from shallower soil than less stressed plants, contributing to yield loss.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
extract water from as deep in the soile0
Qualifier
severely stressed plantse0
Comparator
less stressed plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severely stressed plants could not extract water from as deep in the soil as less stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1998, no wilting was observed after eight weeks without water at simulated PAW40 of 41 mm.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
no wiltinge0
Value
41 mme0
Qualifier
water was withheld for 8 weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1998 simulated PAW40 at sowing was 41 mm and no wilting was observed when water was withheld for 8 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1414 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild water deficit did not affect apparent transpiration efficiency in either year.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
mild water deficite0
Outcome
Apparent transpiration efficiencye0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
either yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apparent transpiration efficiency was not affected by mild water deficit in either year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying sowing in 1998 reduced apparent transpiration efficiency by 35%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
delaying sowinge0
Outcome
Apparent transpiration efficiencye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
35%e0
Qualifier
1998e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apparent transpiration efficiency was not affected by mild water deficit in either year, but was reduced by 35% by delaying sowing in 1998”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed the lower transpiration efficiency of later sowing to higher vapour pressure deficit during reproductive growth.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Outcome
Apparent transpiration efficiencye1
Qualifier
higher atmospheric vapour pressure deficit during reproductive growth of the later-sown crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was due to higher atmospheric vapour pressure deficit during reproductive growth of the later-sown crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1664 · show in text ↑
e1

“Apparent transpiration efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–60 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend against delaying faba bean sowing unless severe early water deficit is strongly likely.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Outcome
delaying sowing in faba beane0
Qualifier
unless there is a strong likelihood of severe water deficit soon after sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delaying sowing in faba bean is more likely to reduce faba bean grain yield unless there is a strong likelihood of severe water deficit soon after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1846 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

40 papers: 7 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.