Paper · 1987 · Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde

Comparison between the seminal and nodal root systems of winter wheat in their activity for N and K uptake

H. Kuhlmann; P. B. Barraclough

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The activity of seminal and nodal root systems of winter wheat (cv. Avalon) in taking up NO 3 − and K + has been measured in solution culture using a split root technique. Plants in the tillering phase of growth (36 days old) were used for the experiment which lasted 20 days. During this time plant dry weights increased by a factor of 20, whilst root: shoot ratios and nutrient compositions remained constant. Inflows (uptake rate per unit root length) were 2–6 times higher for the nodal roots than for the seminal roots, with values varying between 1 and 9 pmol cm −1 s −1 for N and between 0.5 and 4 pmol cm −1 s −1 for K. When uptake was expressed on the basis of unit fresh weight of roots, values ranged from 1 to 2.3 pmol mg −1 s −1 for N and from 0.4 to 1.0 pmol mg −1 s −1 for K, and there were only very small differences in uptake efficiency between the nodal and seminal roots. Uptake rate per unit root decreased with plant age. This was caused by a decline in shoot demand due to the reduction of the relative growth rate. When either the nodal or seminal root system alone was supplied with nutrients, uptake rate per unit root increased and nutrient uptake per plant reached 72–92% of the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inflows were 2–6 times higher for nodal roots than for seminal roots of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Avalone1
Organ / stage
nodal rootse4
Outcome
Inflows (uptake rate per unit root length)e4
Direction
highere4
Value
2–6 timese4
Comparator
seminal rootse4
Setting
solution culturee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat (cv. Avalon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e2

“has been measured in solution culture using a split root technique”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 113–179 · show in text ↑
e4

“Inflows (uptake rate per unit root length) were 2–6 times higher for the nodal roots than for the seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–532 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake efficiency per unit fresh root weight showed only very small differences between nodal and seminal roots of winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
uptake efficiencye5
Direction
only very small differencese5
Comparator
seminal rootse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat (cv. Avalon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e5

“there were only very small differences in uptake efficiency between the nodal and seminal roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–899 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake rate per unit root decreased with plant age in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
plant agee6
Outcome
Uptake rate per unit roote6
Direction
decreasede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat (cv. Avalon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e6

“Uptake rate per unit root decreased with plant age.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–952 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in uptake rate per unit root with plant age was attributed to a decline in shoot demand from the reduced relative growth rate.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
Uptake rate per unit roote6
Qualifier
decline in shoot demand due to the reduction of the relative growth ratee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat (cv. Avalon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e6

“Uptake rate per unit root decreased with plant age.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–952 · show in text ↑
e7

“This was caused by a decline in shoot demand due to the reduction of the relative growth rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When the nodal or seminal root system alone was supplied with nutrients, uptake rate per unit root increased in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
nodal or seminal root systeme0
Treatment
supplied with nutrientse0
Outcome
uptake rate per unit roote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat (cv. Avalon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“When either the nodal or seminal root system alone was supplied with nutrients, uptake rate per unit root increased and nutrient uptake per plant reached 72–92% of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1224 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When the nodal or seminal root system alone was supplied with nutrients, nutrient uptake per plant reached 72–92% of the control in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
supplied with nutrientse0
Outcome
nutrient uptake per plante0
Direction
reachede0
Value
72–92%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat (cv. Avalon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e0

“When either the nodal or seminal root system alone was supplied with nutrients, uptake rate per unit root increased and nutrient uptake per plant reached 72–92% of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1224 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant dry weights of winter wheat increased by a factor of 20 over the 20-day experiment.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
plant dry weightse3
Direction
increasede3
Value
a factor of 20e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat (cv. Avalon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“During this time plant dry weights increased by a factor of 20, whilst root: shoot ratios and nutrient compositions remained constant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–420 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root:shoot ratios and nutrient compositions of winter wheat remained constant during the experiment.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
root: shoot ratios and nutrient compositionse3
Direction
remained constante3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat (cv. Avalon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–84 · show in text ↑
e3

“During this time plant dry weights increased by a factor of 20, whilst root: shoot ratios and nutrient compositions remained constant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–420 · show in text ↑