Paper · 2014 · New Phytologist

Deficient sucrose synthase activity in developing wood does not specifically affect cellulose biosynthesis, but causes an overall decrease in cell wall polymers

Lorenz Gerber; Bo Zhang; Melissa Roach; et al.

7
claims
28
verbatim quotes
80
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The biosynthesis of wood in aspen (Populus) depends on the metabolism of sucrose, which is the main transported form of carbon from source tissues. The largest fraction of the wood biomass is cellulose, which is synthesized from UDP-glucose. Sucrose synthase (SUS) has been proposed previously to interact directly with cellulose synthase complexes and specifically supply UDP-glucose for cellulose biosynthesis. To investigate the role of SUS in wood biosynthesis, we characterized transgenic lines of hybrid aspen with strongly reduced SUS activity in developing wood. No dramatic growth phenotypes in glasshouse-grown trees were observed, but chemical fingerprinting with pyrolysis-GC/MS, together with micromechanical analysis, showed notable changes in chemistry and ultrastructure of the wood in the transgenic lines. Wet chemical analysis showed that the dry weight percentage composition of wood polymers was not changed significantly. However, a decrease in wood density was observed and, consequently, the content of lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose was decreased per wood volume. The decrease in density was explained by a looser structure of fibre cell walls as shown by increased wall shrinkage on drying. The results show that SUS is not essential for cellulose biosynthesis, but plays a role in defining the total carbon incorporation to wood cell walls.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced SUS activity produced no dramatic growth phenotype in glasshouse trees.

Taxon
aspene1
Treatment
reduced SUS activityt1
Outcome
growth phenotypese0
Direction
No dramatice0
Setting
glasshouse-growne0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No dramatic growth phenotypes in glasshouse-grown trees were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“aspen (Populus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“transgenic lines of hybrid aspen with strongly reduced SUS activity in developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced SUS lines had notable changes in wood chemistry and ultrastructure.

Taxon
aspene1
Treatment
transgenic linese0
Outcome
chemistry and ultrastructure of the woode0
Direction
changese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“showed notable changes in chemistry and ultrastructure of the wood in the transgenic lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“aspen (Populus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“transgenic lines of hybrid aspen with strongly reduced SUS activity in developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry-weight percentage composition of wood polymers did not change significantly.

Taxon
aspene1
Treatment
transgenic linest1
Outcome
dry weight percentage composition of wood polymerse0
Direction
not changede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the dry weight percentage composition of wood polymers was not changed significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“aspen (Populus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“transgenic lines of hybrid aspen with strongly reduced SUS activity in developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wood density decreased in reduced SUS lines.

Taxon
aspene1
Treatment
transgenic linest1
Outcome
wood densitye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in wood density was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“aspen (Populus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“transgenic lines of hybrid aspen with strongly reduced SUS activity in developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose content per wood volume decreased.

Taxon
aspene1
Treatment
transgenic linest1
Outcome
content of lignin, hemicellulose and cellulosee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
per wood volumee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the content of lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose was decreased per wood volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“aspen (Populus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“transgenic lines of hybrid aspen with strongly reduced SUS activity in developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–569 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Looser fibre walls, indicated by increased drying shrinkage, explained lower density.

Taxon
aspene1
Outcome
decrease in densitye0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
looser structure of fibre cell wallse0

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in density was explained by a looser structure of fibre cell walls as shown by increased wall shrinkage on drying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“aspen (Populus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“transgenic lines of hybrid aspen with strongly reduced SUS activity in developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–569 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SUS was not essential for cellulose biosynthesis but influenced total carbon incorporation into wood cell walls.

Taxon
aspene1
Gene
SUSe0
Outcome
total carbon incorporation to wood cell wallse0
Qualifier
not essential for cellulose biosynthesise0

Verbatim

e0

“SUS is not essential for cellulose biosynthesis, but plays a role in defining the total carbon incorporation to wood cell walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑
e1

“aspen (Populus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–43 · show in text ↑
t1

“transgenic lines of hybrid aspen with strongly reduced SUS activity in developing wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–569 · show in text ↑