Paper · 1988 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Inward and Outward Movement of Ammonium in Root Systems: Transient Responses during Recovery from Nitrogen Deprivation in Presence of Ammonium

M. A. MORGAN; W. A. JACKSON

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
51
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Morgan, M. A. and Jackson, W. A. 1988. Inward and outward movement of ammonium in root systems: transient responses during recovery from nitrogen deprivation in presence of ammonium.— J. exp. Bot. 39: 179-191. Net ammonium uptake by 20-d-old wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Kleiber) and oat (Avena sativa cv. Tarok) seedlings was increased 5- to 10-fold when the seedlings were deprived of nitrate during the 14-20 d period. The effect of nitrogen deprivation was to increase net 15N-ammonium influx and decrease net 14N-ammonium efflux during a 1 h assay period. The sizeable rate of net 15N-ammonium influx resulting from nitrogen deprivation was stimulated further by prior exposure of the seedlings to 14N-ammonium for 5 h. Additional exposure to 14N-ammonium caused the stimulated rate of 15N-ammonium influx to decline. During the 1 h assays in 15N-ammonium, net 14N-ammonium efflux increased after 2 h exposure to 14N-ammonium, peaked at 5–10 h, and then declined. The consequence of the differential response of the influx and efflux processes in wheat was a marked decrease in net ammonium uptake in the initial 2–5 h, followed by a recovery which, in turn, was followed by a slow decline. In oat, there was no recovery in net ammonium uptake after 2–5 h. Interference in ammonium assimilation by presence of methionine sulphoximine after 5 h did not inhibit expression of the ammonium-stimulated net 15N-ammonium influx at 10 h but did substantially increase net 14N-ammonium efflux. In nitrogen depleted seedlings, and in those exposed to 14N-ammonium for 2 h, subsequent net 14N-ammonium efflux during 1 h in 15N-ammonium exceeded the quantity of 14N-ammonium initially in the roots. The increase in 15N-ammonium influx upon nitrogen deprivation, its further stimulation with 5-10 h exposure to ammonium and its subsequent decline, are discussed as possibly resulting from (a) the operation of two ammonium influx systems (b) the interplay of tissue ammonium and a product of its assimilation respectively acting as positive and negative effectors of a single influx system and (c) variations in energy supply from the shoots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate deprivation increased net ammonium uptake in wheat seedlings five to tenfold.

Material
Triticum aestivum cv. Kleibere0
Treatment
deprived of nitratee0
Outcome
Net ammonium uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5- to 10-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net ammonium uptake by 20-d-old wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Kleiber) and oat (Avena sativa cv. Tarok) seedlings was increased 5- to 10-fold when the seedlings were deprived of nitrate during the 14-20 d period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate deprivation increased net ammonium uptake in oat seedlings five to tenfold.

Material
Avena sativa cv. Taroke0
Treatment
deprived of nitratee0
Outcome
Net ammonium uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5- to 10-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net ammonium uptake by 20-d-old wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Kleiber) and oat (Avena sativa cv. Tarok) seedlings was increased 5- to 10-fold when the seedlings were deprived of nitrate during the 14-20 d period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–421 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat net uptake fell initially, recovered, then slowly declined.

Outcome
net ammonium uptakee0
Direction
marked decreasee0
Qualifier
followed by a recovery which, in turn, was followed by a slow declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in wheat was a marked decrease in net ammonium uptake in the initial 2–5 h, followed by a recovery which, in turn, was followed by a slow decline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat net ammonium uptake did not recover after two to five hours.

Outcome
net ammonium uptakee0
Direction
no recoverye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In oat, there was no recovery in net ammonium uptake after 2–5 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1261 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 24 positive, 6 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.