Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Fruit Quality and Nitrogen, Potassium, and Calcium Content of Apple as Influenced by Nitrate: Ammonium Ratios in Tree Nutrition

Salim Mohammad Sokri; Mesbah Babalar; Allen V. Barker; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Evaluations of fruit quality and nitrogen, potassium, and calcium concentration of apple (Malus domestica Borkh. cvs. Gala and Golab) grown with five treatments of NO3−:NH4+ ratios were made in pot culture. The concentrations of NO3−:NH4+ ratios were 2.5:0.1, 6:1, 6:0.7, 6:0.5, 6:0.3 meq L−1. Fruit size, percent dry matter, total dissolved solids, total acidity, or juice pH was not affected by increased ammonium in the ratio. Firmness decreased as the proportion of NH4+ increased. Gala and Golab differed in some of these parameters. Concentrations of N and K increased as NH4+ increased, whereas Ca had no trend or decreased. Generally, the treatment of 2.5:0.1 produced fruits with lower N but higher K and Ca concentrations than the other treatments. This research showed that some parameters such as fruit weight, length, and diameter, juice pH, and dry matter were not affected significantly by NH4+ concentration whereas composition was affected.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased ammonium did not affect fruit size, dry matter, dissolved solids, acidity, or juice pH.

Treatment
increased ammonium in the ratioe0
Outcome
Fruit size, percent dry matter, total dissolved solidse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit size, percent dry matter, total dissolved solids, total acidity, or juice pH was not affected by increased ammonium in the ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit firmness declined as ammonium proportion increased.

Treatment
proportion of NH4+e0
Outcome
Firmnesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Firmness decreased as the proportion of NH4+ increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gala and Golab differed in some fruit parameters.

Material
Gala and Golabe0
Outcome
some of these parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gala and Golab differed in some of these parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit nitrogen concentration rose with ammonium.

Treatment
NH4+e0
Outcome
Concentrations of Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of N and K increased as NH4+ increased, whereas Ca had no trend or decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit potassium concentration rose with ammonium.

Treatment
NH4+e0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of N and K increased as NH4+ increased, whereas Ca had no trend or decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit calcium concentration had no consistent trend or declined with ammonium.

Treatment
NH4+e0
Outcome
Cae0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Concentrations of N and K increased as NH4+ increased, whereas Ca had no trend or decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–631 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.5:0.1 ratio yielded lower fruit nitrogen.

Treatment
2.5:0.1e0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of 2.5:0.1 produced fruits with lower N but higher K and Ca concentrations than the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.5:0.1 ratio yielded higher fruit potassium.

Treatment
2.5:0.1e0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of 2.5:0.1 produced fruits with lower N but higher K and Ca concentrations than the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.5:0.1 ratio yielded higher fruit calcium.

Treatment
2.5:0.1e0
Outcome
Ca concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment of 2.5:0.1 produced fruits with lower N but higher K and Ca concentrations than the other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

69 papers: 52 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.