Paper · 2006 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Micronutrient composition of field‐grown dry bean and wheat inoculated with Azospirillum and Trichoderma

Mehmet Öğüt; Fatih Er

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Micronutrient deficiency and malnutrition in humans are severe problems in many developing countries, particularly in areas with calcareous soils. There is almost no information on whether inoculation with plant growth–promoting Azospirillum and/or Trichoderma can help to reduce this problem by increasing the mineral concentration of the seeds. Field experiments were conducted in Tokat (Turkey) in 2001–2002 to determine whether inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense , Trichoderma harzianum , sole or in combination, and/or the application of P fertilizers can enhance micronutrient concentrations of field‐grown bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum ). In beans, Azospirillum inoculation combined with P fertilization significantly ( p < 0.05) increased seed concentrations of Mn, Zn, and Cu, from 8.8, 22.6, and 7.0 mg kg –1 in the control to 10.3, 28.3, and 11.0 mg kg –1 , respectively. Trichoderma inoculation alone significantly ( p < 0.05) reduced the concentrations of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu and the cumulative plant uptake of Fe and Zn in 45‐day‐old bean plants. However, it significantly ( p < 0.05) increased bean‐seed Cu content and accumulation. The double inoculation resulted in significantly ( p < 0.05) higher micronutrient concentrations than Trichoderma inoculation alone in 45‐day‐old plants. In contrast to beans, the effects of microbial inoculations were less in wheat. However, dual inoculation significantly ( p < 0.05) increased Zn content by 45% and Zn accumulation by 40% above the uninoculated control. Inoculation with plant growth–promoting microorganisms appears to be a promising strategy to combat micronutrient deficiencies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum plus P increased bean seed Mn, Zn and Cu concentrations.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
Azospirillum inoculation combined with P fertilizatione0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
seed concentrations of Mn, Zn, and Cue0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azospirillum inoculation combined with P fertilization significantly ( p < 0.05) increased seed concentrations of Mn, Zn, and Cu, from 8.8, 22.6, and 7.0 mg kg –1 in the control to 10.3, 28.3, and 11.0 mg kg –1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“dry bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma reduced Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu concentrations in young bean plants.

Taxon
beane0
Organ / stage
45‐day‐old bean plantse0
Treatment
Trichoderma inoculation alonee0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0symbiont
Outcome
concentrations of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cue0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma inoculation alone significantly ( p < 0.05) reduced the concentrations of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu and the cumulative plant uptake of Fe and Zn in 45‐day‐old bean plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma reduced cumulative Fe and Zn uptake in young beans.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
Trichoderma inoculation alonee0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0symbiont
Outcome
cumulative plant uptake of Fe and Zne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trichoderma inoculation alone significantly ( p < 0.05) reduced the concentrations of Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu and the cumulative plant uptake of Fe and Zn in 45‐day‐old bean plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma increased bean seed Cu content and accumulation.

Taxon
beane0
Outcome
bean‐seed Cu content and accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“it significantly ( p < 0.05) increased bean‐seed Cu content and accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation raised micronutrient concentrations relative to Trichoderma alone.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
double inoculatione0
Outcome
micronutrient concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Trichoderma inoculation alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“The double inoculation resulted in significantly ( p < 0.05) higher micronutrient concentrations than Trichoderma inoculation alone in 45‐day‐old plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“dry bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation increased wheat Zn content by 45%.

Treatment
dual inoculatione0
Outcome
Zn contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
45%e0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation significantly ( p < 0.05) increased Zn content by 45% and Zn accumulation by 40% above the uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation increased wheat Zn accumulation by 40%.

Treatment
dual inoculatione0
Outcome
Zn accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dual inoculation significantly ( p < 0.05) increased Zn content by 45% and Zn accumulation by 40% above the uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 52 positive, 13 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.