Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

IMPACT OF SULFUR FERTILIZATION ON DIFFERENT FORMS AND BALANCE OF SOIL SULFUR AND THE NUTRITION OF WHEAT IN WHEAT-SOYBEAN CROPPING SEQUENCE INTARAISOIL

Shiveshwar Pratap Singh; Room Singh; Mukesh Prasad Singh; et al.

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at farmer's field in Mollisols of Tarai soils in Uttarakhand (India), to assess the direct and residual effect of sulfur fertilization in wheat-soybean cropping sequence. Four levels of sulfur (S; 0, 15, 30, and 45 kg ha−1) were applied to main crop (wheat) along with recommended dose of nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K). The direct and residual effect of sulfur at highest level showed 27 and 6 percent increase in grain yield of wheat and soybean over control, respectively. The increase in grain yield of wheat was significant at each sulfur level. The direct as well as residual effect of sulfur showed significant increase in sulfur concentration and its uptake by grain and straw except increase in sulfur concentration and uptake by soybean straw. In wheat-soybean cropping sequence, the agronomic efficiency and apparent sulfur recovery decreased with increase in levels of sulfur, but the percent response increased with increasing sulfur application. Different forms of sulfur such as total sulfur, organic sulfur, calcium chloride extractable sulfur, potassium dihydrogen phosphate extractable sulfur, and non-sulfate sulfur in post-harvest soil increased according to sulfur level applied but it decreased under control and also after residual crops. The buildup of sulfur in surface soils was greater than in the deeper soils. Application of sulfur showed the positive sulfur balance and it increased with increase in sulfur level, while it was negative under control. A major portion (46–62%) of applied sulfur contributed to increase in sulfur content of root zone soil followed by unaccounted component (25–40%) and small portion (11–18%) was absorbed by wheat plant as uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest sulfur level increased wheat grain yield 27 percent over control.

Treatment
sulfur at highest levele0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasee0
Value
27e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The direct and residual effect of sulfur at highest level showed 27 and 6 percent increase in grain yield of wheat and soybean over control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual sulfur increased soybean grain yield 6 percent over control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
sulfur at highest levele0
Outcome
grain yield of wheat and soybeane0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6 percente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The direct and residual effect of sulfur at highest level showed 27 and 6 percent increase in grain yield of wheat and soybean over control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain yield rose significantly at every sulfur level.

Treatment
each sulfur levele0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in grain yield of wheat was significant at each sulfur level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur significantly increased sulfur concentration and uptake in grain and straw, except soybean straw.

Taxon
wheat-soybeane0
Treatment
sulfure1
Outcome
sulfur concentration and its uptake by grain and strawe1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
except increase in sulfur concentration and uptake by soybean strawe1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat-soybean cropping sequence,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“The direct as well as residual effect of sulfur showed significant increase in sulfur concentration and its uptake by grain and straw except increase in sulfur concentration and uptake by soybean straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–804 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic efficiency and apparent sulfur recovery decreased as sulfur levels rose.

Taxon
wheat-soybeane0
Treatment
levels of sulfure0
Outcome
agronomic efficiency and apparent sulfur recoverye0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“wheat-soybean cropping sequence, the agronomic efficiency and apparent sulfur recovery decreased with increase in levels of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–938 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Percent response increased as sulfur application rose.

Taxon
wheat-soybeane0
Treatment
sulfur applicatione1
Outcome
percent responsee1
Direction
increasede1

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat-soybean cropping sequence,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“the percent response increased with increasing sulfur application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1009 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest soil sulfur forms increased with applied sulfur level.

Taxon
wheat-soybeane0
Treatment
sulfur level appliede1
Outcome
Different forms of sulfure1
Direction
increasede1

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat-soybean cropping sequence,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“Different forms of sulfur such as total sulfur, organic sulfur, calcium chloride extractable sulfur, potassium dihydrogen phosphate extractable sulfur, and non-sulfate sulfur in post-harvest soil increased according to sulfur level applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1250 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil sulfur forms decreased under control and after residual crops.

Taxon
wheat-soybeane0
Outcome
ite1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat-soybean cropping sequence,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“it decreased under control and also after residual crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1311 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur buildup was greater in surface than deeper soil.

Taxon
wheat-soybeane0
Outcome
buildup of sulfur in surface soilse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
deeper soilse1

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat-soybean cropping sequence,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“The buildup of sulfur in surface soils was greater than in the deeper soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur balance was positive with sulfur application and increased with dose.

Taxon
wheat-soybeane0
Treatment
Application of sulfure1
Outcome
sulfur balancee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat-soybean cropping sequence,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–840 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of sulfur showed the positive sulfur balance and it increased with increase in sulfur level, while it was negative under control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1531 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of applied sulfur, 46–62% increased root-zone soil sulfur.

Outcome
sulfur content of root zone soile1
Value
46–62%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1732 · show in text ↑
e1

“A major portion (46–62%) of applied sulfur contributed to increase in sulfur content of root zone soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The unaccounted sulfur fraction was 25–40%.

Outcome
unaccounted componente1
Value
25–40%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1732 · show in text ↑
e1

“unaccounted component (25–40%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1677 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat absorbed 11–18% of applied sulfur.

Taxon
wheat plantTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
absorbed by wheat plant as uptakee0
Value
11–18%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“small portion (11–18%) was absorbed by wheat plant as uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1742 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

92 papers: 76 positive, 16 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.