Paper · 1997 · Agronomy Journal

Interrupting Yield Depression in Monoculture Corn: Comparative Effectiveness of Grasses and Dicots

Paul M. Porter; R. Kent Crookston; J. Harlan Ford; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
27
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract It has been well documented that monoculture corn ( Zea mays L.) yields less than corn grown in certain rotations. This field study conducted from 1992 through 1995 investigated several agronomic crops, rotated with corn, for their relative effectiveness in interrupting the yield depression associated with corn monoculture. The study was conducted on a Webster clay loam (fine‐loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Endoaquolls) near Lamberton, MN. Corn grain yields were increased by a single‐year interruption with either alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) or sunflower ( Helianthus annuus L.) for each of 4 yr, with the exception of sunflower in 1992. Averaged cross 4 yr, corn yields were increased from 7.81 Mg ha −4 for continuous corn by 19 and 17% following a single year of alfalfa and sunflower, respectively. A single year of sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], sorghum × sudangrass (intraspecific S. bicolor hybrid), or fallow did not improve corn yields compared with corn monoculture. This was true for each year, and when averaged across 4 yr, with the exception of the corn‐fallow rotation in 1995. Averaged across 4 yr, a 2‐yr interruption with sunflower followed by alfalfa increased corn yield by 22%. A 2‐yr interruption of sorghum followed by sorghum × sudangrass increased corn yield by 6% over that of monoculture. We conclude that the closely related grasses were relatively ineffective rotation crops for corn. Leguminous alfalfa and nonleguminous sunflower were equally effective in alleviating the corn monoculture yield depression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One year of alfalfa increased corn yields by 19% relative to continuous corn.

Treatment
a single year of alfalfae0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19e0
Qualifier
7.81 Mg ha −4e0
Comparator
continuous corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn yields were increased from 7.81 Mg ha −4 for continuous corn by 19 and 17% following a single year of alfalfa and sunflower, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One year of sunflower increased corn yields by 17% relative to continuous corn.

Treatment
sunflowere0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0
Comparator
continuous corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn yields were increased from 7.81 Mg ha −4 for continuous corn by 19 and 17% following a single year of alfalfa and sunflower, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One year of sorghum did not improve corn yield over monoculture.

Treatment
sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]e0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
corn monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single year of sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], sorghum × sudangrass (intraspecific S. bicolor hybrid), or fallow did not improve corn yields compared with corn monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One year of sorghum × sudangrass did not improve corn yield over monoculture.

Treatment
sorghum × sudangrasse0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
did not improvee0
Comparator
corn monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A single year of sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], sorghum × sudangrass (intraspecific S. bicolor hybrid), or fallow did not improve corn yields compared with corn monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One year of fallow did not improve corn yield over monoculture, except in 1995.

Treatment
fallowe0
Outcome
corn yieldse0
Direction
did not improvee0
Qualifier
exception of the corn‐fallow rotation in 1995e1
Comparator
corn monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fallow did not improve corn yields compared with corn monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–995 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the exception of the corn‐fallow rotation in 1995.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two years of sunflower then alfalfa increased corn yield by 22%.

Treatment
sunflower followed by alfalfae0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
corn monoculturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 2‐yr interruption with sunflower followed by alfalfa increased corn yield by 22%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1217 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with corn monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two years of sorghum then sorghum × sudangrass increased corn yield by 6%.

Treatment
sorghum followed by sorghum × sudangrasse0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2‐yr interruption of sorghum followed by sorghum × sudangrass increased corn yield by 6% over that of monoculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1334 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that related grasses were relatively ineffective corn rotation crops.

Outcome
relatively ineffective rotation cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the closely related grasses were relatively ineffective rotation crops for corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1432 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa and sunflower were equally effective at alleviating monoculture yield depression.

Outcome
monoculture yield depressione0
Comparator
Leguminous alfalfa and nonleguminous sunflowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leguminous alfalfa and nonleguminous sunflower were equally effective in alleviating the corn monoculture yield depression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1556 · show in text ↑

Sorghum x drummondii · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Sorghum bicolor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Sorghum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Medicago sativa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 28 positive, 6 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 254 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.